RT @MishaTeplitskiy: Psychologists frame their findings as overly broad, and audiences find such claims more important https://t.co/Nga8Ii…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: Psychologists frame their findings as overly broad, and audiences find such claims more important https://t.co/Nga8Ii…
Psychologists frame their findings as overly broad, and audiences find such claims more important https://t.co/Nga8Iiqubt
RT @RebeccaSear: On the problematic use of language in psychology: "generic language (eg Introverts & extraverts need diff learning environ…
RT @RebeccaSear: On the problematic use of language in psychology: "generic language (eg Introverts & extraverts need diff learning environ…
RT @RebeccaSear: On the problematic use of language in psychology: "generic language (eg Introverts & extraverts need diff learning environ…
On the problematic use of language in psychology: "generic language (eg Introverts & extraverts need diff learning environments) was ubiquitously used, despite most articles not mentioning sample demographics. Readers judged generic results more import
Scientists who favor generic, bolder claims in their research may lose precision and could potentially have the unintended consequence of spreading misinformation, according to this study: https://t.co/YrjnKtmwbp
@lakens @talyarkoni @reneebleau @tunc_uygun @yuvalbenj @wfithian @fmg_twtr probably y'all should be aware that there's a literature on this: https://t.co/uRZPLLx63b https://t.co/mpBAzsjFFx
wonder if there's a "generic language" thing happening whenever we talk about a part of "the brain" as an abstraction superordinate to the brains of the subjects (animal or human) used in the experiments. probably an obvious point about generalizing but
cc @neoyorquinanerd because this is just amateurish guessing on my part. Only thing I’ve read on this front directly is https://t.co/h8OUvxtnzr
RT @ma_edits: Readers judge generic language in scientific communication to be more important than non-generic language? https://t.co/fwU…
Readers judge generic language in scientific communication to be more important than non-generic language? https://t.co/fwUBFgBGL6 https://t.co/LCHcbfoTjM
Psychologists use general language when talking about their conclusions, when there are potentially important constraints https://t.co/NNNgc407Gu by @jas_dejesus, Callanan, Solis, & Gelman. (this tweet is also an example of the general claims used!)
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @watercomm: Interesting paper on generic language in science communication. Authors highlight "potential unintended consequences of lang…
RT @jared_wadley: .@umichLSA @um_psychology Susan Gelman: We make generalizations all the time, so that just seems sort of simple. Nothing…
.@umichLSA @um_psychology Susan Gelman: We make generalizations all the time, so that just seems sort of simple. Nothing much to it. But they’re complicated. #language
RT @ParsingScience: Episode 63 out now! Susan Gelman from @um_psychology discusses her research into the proliferation of generic language…
Episode 63 out now! Susan Gelman from @um_psychology discusses her research into the proliferation of generic language in scientific papers. Article @ https://t.co/NvVls7lD5t https://t.co/7lxHQmOInb
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @CedScherer: Oh that irony 😂 https://t.co/U7Y2d6hTSs
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Oh that irony 😂
RT @melikedonertas: Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/VQG2zzmhta
Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/VQG2zzmhta
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @m_the_cohen: Interesting paper in PNAS shows that readers find results more interesting if broad/generic language (i.e., introverts vs…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @Anthony_Bonato: "We highlight potential unintended consequences of language choice in scientific communication, as well as what these c…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
"We highlight potential unintended consequences of language choice in scientific communication, as well as what these choices reveal about how scientists think about their data." Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/XtRtftOZgN
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
#AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter Yall need to read the comments/replies...hilarious!
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @TysonWepprich: So...who's going to tell them? https://t.co/iLJgjksObY
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
@StuartJRitchie Whoever wrote the tweet/ press release should look at this tweet https://t.co/k0iXUiA50B
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @RobKnell1: ... and the Winner of the “least self-aware social media posting of the decade” award is... https://t.co/ZVDTCW4HOs
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/mwaHHLNuW2
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
The rhetoric of science is explored in this recent @PNAS study of the language of scientific journals #science https://t.co/JwOGXcLlrF
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @TomClaybourn: PNAS admits they’re part of the problem. Let’s hope they *realise* they’re part of the problem https://t.co/QQMCEuWAlU
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @adamthomasford: I found this paper too vague and localized in scope. https://t.co/ctql8swvh3
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @Write4Research: Using overly generic language in scientific communication distorts communication in psychology. Only an abstract and te…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Using overly generic language in scientific communication distorts communication in psychology. Only an abstract and text ($), but still useful. Also seems v.true of behavioural research in political science https://t.co/optAuZcGXL
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PsychRabble: Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "mi…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
I found this paper too vague and localized in scope.
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PsychRabble: Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "mi…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PsychRabble: Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "mi…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PsychRabble: Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "mi…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PsychRabble: Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "mi…