RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MattGrossmann: 89% of psychology articles described results using generic language that implied generalizability across time & populati…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @m_the_cohen: Interesting paper in PNAS shows that readers find results more interesting if broad/generic language (i.e., introverts vs…
... and the Winner of the “least self-aware social media posting of the decade” award is...
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @LukeHolman_Evo: ORLY, PNAS. https://t.co/IBrYfHSCiG
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
ORLY, PNAS.
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @drlynnchiu: It will be useful to collaborate with philosophers of science for generalized claims. Philosophers are experts at making ri…
RT @bbtumolo: To quote Darth Vader "The irony is strong with this one" or at least in the way it has been tweeted out ;) https://t.co/w82Ao…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
🤔
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
So-called scientific certainty is so over-rated
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @bbtumolo: To quote Darth Vader "The irony is strong with this one" or at least in the way it has been tweeted out ;) https://t.co/w82Ao…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @head_like_egg: Isn't it ironic? Don't you think? https://t.co/OhIgZ2aEFf
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @jamesheathers: Are we still doing "Congratulations, you played yourself"? https://t.co/SK1puRqTsI
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @zerdeve: So what I find odd abt this is that the paper seems to provide evidence for only the prevalence of generalized claims. The res…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
I am not sure how many quantum revolutions I have witnessed in my short scientific career...and more to come, stay tuned!
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @aaronjfisher: Fantastic paper. Though, the problem goes beyond titles and abstracts. Literature reviews in intros & discussions regular…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JulienGossa: [#VeilleESR] La tendances des scientifiques à favoriser les affirmations générales les plus audacieuses pourrait sacrifier…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @jamesheathers: Are we still doing "Congratulations, you played yourself"? https://t.co/SK1puRqTsI
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @MohammadAtari90: Maybe some big journals should stop desk-rejecting not-generalized, not-bold papers. Maybe. https://t.co/KHM1mLpbDI
Food for thought...
RT @MohammadAtari90: Maybe some big journals should stop desk-rejecting not-generalized, not-bold papers. Maybe. https://t.co/KHM1mLpbDI
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
@sammy_aw @secureuser1 @IsraHazel https://t.co/Kr0tRBWCxl ليك هاي هلأ طلعتلي كمان لك يا زلمي حتى عمستوى العلم وتحقق العديد من المعايير ما بيسترجو العلماء يعمموا!
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Ya think? Why is this news?
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MHendr1cks: I can't https://t.co/B5cKj3KsYq
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Interesting paper in PNAS shows that readers find results more interesting if broad/generic language (i.e., introverts vs extroverts) is used instead of precise/specific/careful language. Important for things like sample sizes, power, and specificity. htt
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
? Is @pnas any different?
So what I find odd abt this is that the paper seems to provide evidence for only the prevalence of generalized claims. The rest of the claim endorsed by @PNASNews (the part w “may” and “could”) has nothing to do with the presented evidence. Speaking of spr
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…