RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Yes! It's a myth that clarity & complexity are mutually exclusive. Good communication conveys both #scicomm
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @MattGrossmann: 89% of psychology articles described results using generic language that implied generalizability across time & populati…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @DavidGDrubin: Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell) h…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
Carefully consider all words in your title, the reviewer sure will. Don’t turf out the next scientists to come to the issue by claimimg findings complete, just to slay the impact
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Ya le están echando la culpa de nuevo a los científicos, pero a los tendenciosos. A los que sustentan lo que está de moda y fortalecen la desinformación. Mucho trabajo por hacer para la #comunicacióncientífica
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @HannahSFraser: I'm currently working on a more nuanced discussion of this that takes into account what's written in the discussion as w…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
Are they kidding? https://t.co/vGQHiZGPYR
THE TENDENCY OF SCIENTISTS to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentially have the unintended consequence of spreading misinformation… https://t.co/dgY9BHvuq4
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
satire or self own?
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @DavidGDrubin: Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell) h…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @RobKnell1: ... and the Winner of the “least self-aware social media posting of the decade” award is... https://t.co/ZVDTCW4HOs
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/oOuJuvjqiU
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leading to overly broad claims. Based on a specific studies *in psychology.* The tweet then replaces the specific "psychologists" with the
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MattGrossmann: 89% of psychology articles described results using generic language that implied generalizability across time & populati…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
You Don't Say
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell)
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JohnGilleard: This is a major problem that our whole academic system is increasingly fuelling. Pressure from #metrics and oversimplif…
RT @bbtumolo: To quote Darth Vader "The irony is strong with this one" or at least in the way it has been tweeted out ;) https://t.co/w82Ao…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…