RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @DavidGDrubin: Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell) h…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
"unintended"
RT @PsychRabble: Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "mi…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PsychRabble: Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "mi…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Whoda thunk? Scientists? Making unjustifiably bold claims? That are, on examination, a bit fuzzy? And they spread "misinformation"? Scientists? Fake news? They would never do such a thing. Never. That's why we have peer review. Right?
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @TysonWepprich: So...who's going to tell them? https://t.co/iLJgjksObY
Very interesting study, and very relevant to my field as well. How many times are we tempted to make extrapolation of our findings, just to get someone's attention, and convince that our results matter?
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @TysonWepprich: So...who's going to tell them? https://t.co/iLJgjksObY
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @TysonWepprich: So...who's going to tell them? https://t.co/iLJgjksObY
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @TysonWepprich: So...who's going to tell them? https://t.co/iLJgjksObY
Ironically, the actual paper's title is also 'generic' since the work focuses on psychology research. Oh, and paywall.
RT @WaterworldNPS: FundingSources/Major Publications want: ❌Negative data ❌Replication of previous experiments ☑️Broad impact statement ☑️G…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Para pensar cuando elegimos el título o el "take home message", sobre todo los que nos dedicamos a la psicología expermiental.
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @RobKnell1: ... and the Winner of the “least self-aware social media posting of the decade” award is... https://t.co/ZVDTCW4HOs
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
Ha ha ha! Le #PourrissementDesNormesDeProbationScientifique DATE de #HenriPoincaré et des escroqueries #positivisme Les #LoisScientifiques sont INHÉRENTES à la #réalité Prétendre qu'elles seraient #LibresCréationsDeLespritHumain est faire passer la technol
Anti-science activists often win because scientists refuse to use definitive language, favoring hesitant uncertainty, while some in social science use overly general broad claims to generate bold conclusions. The public loses both ways. https://t.co/7T64g
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Who’d a thunk it? #AcademicChatter https://t.co/lThl4s42vu
RT @TysonWepprich: So...who's going to tell them? https://t.co/iLJgjksObY
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @TysonWepprich: So...who's going to tell them? https://t.co/iLJgjksObY
So...who's going to tell them?
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
PNAS admits they’re part of the problem. Let’s hope they *realise* they’re part of the problem
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
at least once per week my boss will correct me and send me in the direction of simple over-generalized claims.
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MHendr1cks: I can't https://t.co/B5cKj3KsYq
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
RT @MHendr1cks: I can't https://t.co/B5cKj3KsYq
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…