RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
Why would that be, one wonders?
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @AlexKale17: Reminds me of the tendency to claim that effect sizes represent the absolute effectiveness of interventions, rather than di…
RT @AlexKale17: Reminds me of the tendency to claim that effect sizes represent the absolute effectiveness of interventions, rather than di…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
I provide all type of photo editing,If you need please contact me. https://t.co/jHjmSu3XiW
Good to have this sort of study published, even though it, itself, falls into the same trap of overgeneralizing. Clarity of science communication to the public is critical, but hard to communicate all of the details in the attention span of the audience!
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
Reminds me of the tendency to claim that effect sizes represent the absolute effectiveness of interventions, rather than differences in performance between two interventions. A subtle distinction that people tend to mess up when they gloss the findings of
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MHendr1cks: I can't https://t.co/B5cKj3KsYq
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JulienGossa: [#VeilleESR] La tendances des scientifiques à favoriser les affirmations générales les plus audacieuses pourrait sacrifier…
dot dot dot @AcademicChatter
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
But this couldn’t possibly have anything to do with needing to publish to keep their jobs, now could it? Nahhhh.
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @mortensode: Her er et lidt andet eksempel hvor forskerne anvender formuleringer der får budskabet til at glide lettere ned samtidig med…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
And yet we are ‘encouraged’ to ensure our work is applicable to as wide an audience possible. Is the constant pressure to increase our impact factor responsible? #AcademicTwitter
RT @JulienGossa: [#VeilleESR] La tendances des scientifiques à favoriser les affirmations générales les plus audacieuses pourrait sacrifier…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
USA: where scientists use bolder claims in their research, precision can be sacrificed, and (unintended consequence) misinformation can spread | PNAS | Sept 2019 https://t.co/Ot2jlLLGnc https://t.co/PI29Vo4NsJ
Fta “In an analysis of 1,149 psychology articles, 89% described results using generics” and that warrants “the tendency of scientists”l?! This is why people bird dog words like “science”. It is tru that psy is “science” but this tweet is a meta example of
RT @SinaLeipold: Self-irony at its best! ;-D #scicomm https://t.co/DPfv7JR0Bk
Self-irony at its best! ;-D #scicomm
RT @jamesheathers: Are we still doing "Congratulations, you played yourself"? https://t.co/SK1puRqTsI
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
I can't
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
“Online workers and undergraduate students (n = 1,578) judged findings expressed with generic language more important than findings expressed with nongeneric language.” https://t.co/0lECjR4F5u #generic #nongeneric #onlinework #undergraduates #research #fin
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
To quote Darth Vader "The irony is strong with this one" or at least in the way it has been tweeted out ;)
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
When I first started doing medical decision making research, I was AMAZED at how important it is in that field to describe your sample. I am still unlearning bad habits
“Contributed by Susan A. Gelman, July 20, 2019 (sent for review October 15, 2018; reviewed by Ellen M. Markman and Douglas L. Medin)” so how does this work? Author = editor and appoints reviewers one works with?
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Generic language in scientific communication | PNAS https://t.co/4zVQVbFe0A, see more https://t.co/P6itrQPnIb
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JulienGossa: [#VeilleESR] La tendances des scientifiques à favoriser les affirmations générales les plus audacieuses pourrait sacrifier…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JulienGossa: [#VeilleESR] La tendances des scientifiques à favoriser les affirmations générales les plus audacieuses pourrait sacrifier…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @MattGrossmann: 89% of psychology articles described results using generic language that implied generalizability across time & populati…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @MattGrossmann: 89% of psychology articles described results using generic language that implied generalizability across time & populati…
RT @cmMcConnaughy: Now do economics and political science. https://t.co/QGtU40mpOn
RT @MattGrossmann: 89% of psychology articles described results using generic language that implied generalizability across time & populati…
Now do economics and political science.
89% of psychology articles described results using generic language that implied generalizability across time & populations; people judged these findings as more important than findings expressed with nongeneric language #SocSciResearch https://t.co/F
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @schneiderleonid: You publish fraud and bunk regularly https://t.co/n5y5B6bHzs
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JulienGossa: [#VeilleESR] La tendances des scientifiques à favoriser les affirmations générales les plus audacieuses pourrait sacrifier…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
[#VeilleESR] La tendances des scientifiques à favoriser les affirmations générales les plus audacieuses pourrait sacrifier la précision et avoir des conséquences involontaires de désinformation. En plus court : la pression à la publication tue la science.
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @drlynnchiu: It will be useful to collaborate with philosophers of science for generalized claims. Philosophers are experts at making ri…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @MohammadAtari90: Maybe some big journals should stop desk-rejecting not-generalized, not-bold papers. Maybe. https://t.co/KHM1mLpbDI
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @jamesheathers: Are we still doing "Congratulations, you played yourself"? https://t.co/SK1puRqTsI