RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Are we still doing "Congratulations, you played yourself"?
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences...
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
😂
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @head_like_egg: Isn't it ironic? Don't you think? https://t.co/OhIgZ2aEFf
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @EikoFried: Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their his…
Interesting study, but also great to see Twitter trolling PNAS in this thread ("is this a parody account?"), given their history of publishing studies with wild claims and shaky data.
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @WiringTheBrain: Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples https://t.co/50Rgmk0tVM
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
It will be useful to collaborate with philosophers of science for generalized claims. Philosophers are experts at making rigorous arguments for general interpretations & mapping detailed, pluralistic implications.
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Yeah, this 👇 Making sweeping general statements from data on small, specific samples
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @mortensode: Her er et lidt andet eksempel hvor forskerne anvender formuleringer der får budskabet til at glide lettere ned samtidig med…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Her er et lidt andet eksempel hvor forskerne anvender formuleringer der får budskabet til at glide lettere ned samtidig med at præcision og variation i fund forsvinder - med det resultat at de kommer til at sprede information der ikke er belæg for https://
RT @DCrafa: This is a crucial conversation to have. Imposing human language and paradigms reduces natural phenomena into understandable con…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
This is a crucial conversation to have. Imposing human language and paradigms reduces natural phenomena into understandable concepts - producing MUCH data loss. Overstating findings is analogous to cave paintings of the natural world. Science should attemp
RT @JohnGilleard: This is a major problem that our whole academic system is increasingly fuelling. Pressure from #metrics and oversimplif…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @FloodHydrology: Something I've often worried about. https://t.co/J2KDCFVZix
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
This is a rather generalised, bold claim...
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @SilverVVulpes: PNAS paper: The only reason science myths exist is that the vast majority of scientific articles are oversensationalized…
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Hmmm
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @head_like_egg: Isn't it ironic? Don't you think? https://t.co/OhIgZ2aEFf
RT @JRB_Neuropsiq: Most important observation 👇🏼 https://t.co/fr3KPMwdLW
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
Most important observation 👇🏼
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @BullshitQuantum: Not bullshit. https://t.co/UOvJMNFn9h
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
A product of societal pressures? Hubris? Arrogance? Just bad science?
RT @DebiecJacek: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potenti…
The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentially have the unintended consequence of spreading misinformation, according to a new study https://t.co/OnumeA5tKD
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q
RT @statsepi: No shit Sherlock. https://t.co/RzlYqPMO9Q