RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentially have the unintended consequence of spreading misinformation, according to a new study. In PNAS: https://t.co/44cSqfLlSp https://t
Interesting article on using generic language in science and the importance of "constraints on generality" Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/Fd0YNTCUl4
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
Para reflexionar... #BTCUNAM
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
That such an article is published in PNAS is irony at its best.
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
RT @PNASNews: Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that…
Scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of generalized, bolder claims, according to researchers who suggest that generic language usage may have unintended consequences. In PNAS: https://t.co/Ncfo4gTRjQ https://t.co/R3aGTTddZm
An analysis of over 2,500 published psychological science papers found that a large majority appeared to overgeneralize findings from limited samples in their titles, abstracts, and highlights. https://t.co/r1JtkyoRFs https://t.co/XgCU993D0w
An analysis of over 2,500 published psychological science papers found that a large majority appeare #علوم https://t.co/Ne8bYGvLQ7
https://t.co/8D7nANu337 An analysis of over 2,500 published psychological science papers found that a large majority appeared to overgeneralize findings from limited samples in their titles, abstracts, and highlights. #sciencenews https://t.co/DBjh4Df0id
“Online workers and undergraduate students (n = 1,578) judged [scientific] findings expressed with generic language more important than findings expressed with nongeneric language.” https://t.co/XBgNg2VhKx https://t.co/77xaPAsSY2
Generic language in scientific communication #pnas https://t.co/URGn7f1jgh
New post in Dimatematicas: https://t.co/LKdzALaFGJ https://t.co/qYpkFI1EjK
Generic language in scientific communication [Psychological and Cognitive Sciences] https://t.co/eUiWpA17Il @PNASNews
RT @jmmulet: El uso de lenguaje genérico en la lioteratura científica puede llevar a imprecisiones. https://t.co/b35nPhCxqI cc @PNASNews
RT @jmmulet: El uso de lenguaje genérico en la lioteratura científica puede llevar a imprecisiones. https://t.co/b35nPhCxqI cc @PNASNews
El uso de lenguaje genérico en la lioteratura científica puede llevar a imprecisiones. https://t.co/b35nPhCxqI cc @PNASNews
RT @hcp4715: "Readers judged results expressed with generic language to be more important and generalizable than findings expressed with no…
RT @tmandalaywala: Fascinating new work from @jas_dejesus et al. on the prevalence & consequences of generics in scientific publications. T…
A glimpse into the consequences of language choice in scientific communication #scicomm https://t.co/E6ZLQOWY3o
"Readers judged results expressed with generic language to be more important and generalizable than findings expressed with nongeneric language." I think that's why the "limitations" part in a paper probably put the authors in a disadvantaged position: h
RT @tmandalaywala: Fascinating new work from @jas_dejesus et al. on the prevalence & consequences of generics in scientific publications. T…
Fascinating new work from @jas_dejesus et al. on the prevalence & consequences of generics in scientific publications. Take home: generics lead readers to draw broad conclusions and believe that results are important (not necessarily a good thing here!
RT @ParsingScience: Readers found to interpret broad, bold but non-specific depictions of psychology research as more important and univers…
Generic language in scientific communication | PNAS https://t.co/8JEpvGJVj0
Generic language in scientific communication | PNAS https://t.co/N9GYHfs6DH
“Introverts and extraverts require different learning environments”, or how scientific writing sacrifices precision in favor of bolder claims https://t.co/mgpDlLq5DF
RT @sabine_doebel: Just added this hot-off-the-press article to my course syllabus at the 11th hour... Should be instructive for students j…
Readers found to interpret broad, bold but non-specific depictions of psychology research as more important and universal than more nuanced ones. https://t.co/Paz1gsqYI0
RT @watercomm: Interesting paper on generic language in science communication. Authors highlight "potential unintended consequences of lang…
RT @jas_dejesus: Excited this paper is finally out!! A very different topic for me, but I learned a ton from this project. A good complemen…
RT @jas_dejesus: Excited this paper is finally out!! A very different topic for me, but I learned a ton from this project. A good complemen…
RT @mrkm_a: "[R]eaders judged results expressed with generic language to be more important and generalizable than findings expressed with n…
Excited this paper is finally out!! A very different topic for me, but I learned a ton from this project. A good complement for discussions about sampling bias -- if our samples are not that diverse or representative, does our writing reflect that? (short
Just added this hot-off-the-press article to my course syllabus at the 11th hour... Should be instructive for students just learning about our field!: 'Generic language in scientific communication' @jas_dejesus https://t.co/x6SHB2p13N
RT @mrkm_a: "[R]eaders judged results expressed with generic language to be more important and generalizable than findings expressed with n…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: "Because scientists are encouraged to reach broad audiences, scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of bol…
"[R]eaders judged results expressed with generic language to be more important and generalizable than findings expressed with nongeneric language." DeJesus et al. (in press). Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/XBatPYwyZ0
RT @watercomm: Interesting paper on generic language in science communication. Authors highlight "potential unintended consequences of lang…
Interesting paper on generic language in science communication. Authors highlight "potential unintended consequences of language choice in scientific communication, as well as what these choices reveal about how scientists think about their data." #SciComm
RT @elenagomezdiaz: "Because scientists are encouraged to reach broad audiences, scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of bol…
"Because scientists are encouraged to reach broad audiences, scientific writing may sacrifice precision in favor of bolder claims" says this article about #scicomm in @PNASNews What are the limits of #science popularisation/vulgarisation? https://t.co