RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
The comments are amazing...
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MohammadAtari90: Maybe some big journals should stop desk-rejecting not-generalized, not-bold papers. Maybe. https://t.co/KHM1mLpbDI
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @DavidGDrubin: Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell) h…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @DavidGDrubin: Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell) h…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @DavidGDrubin: Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell) h…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @anthroworks: So-called scientific certainty is so over-rated https://t.co/wsvkNhIaeP
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @DavidGDrubin: Truth! Just look at the titles of articles published today vs the classic articles published B.C.* (B.C.= Before Cell) h…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @head_like_egg: Isn't it ironic? Don't you think? https://t.co/OhIgZ2aEFf
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @RobKnell1: ... and the Winner of the “least self-aware social media posting of the decade” award is... https://t.co/ZVDTCW4HOs
Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/b3jnP3wsNG
Interesting, especially comments below this highly generalized news... I am still trying to figure out how titles can be less general than abstracts. Any ideas?
RT @RobKnell1: ... and the Winner of the “least self-aware social media posting of the decade” award is... https://t.co/ZVDTCW4HOs
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @ManuSaunders: Yes! It's a myth that clarity & complexity are mutually exclusive. Good communication conveys both #scicomm https://t.co/…
RT @ManuSaunders: Yes! It's a myth that clarity & complexity are mutually exclusive. Good communication conveys both #scicomm https://t.co/…
RT @KamounLab: This sounds to me like a generalized bold claim that sacrifices precision and could potentially have unintended consequences…
RT @RobKnell1: ... and the Winner of the “least self-aware social media posting of the decade” award is... https://t.co/ZVDTCW4HOs
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @PNASNews: The tendency of scientists to favor generalized, bolder claims in their research may sacrifice precision and could potentiall…
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
RT @m_the_cohen: Interesting paper in PNAS shows that readers find results more interesting if broad/generic language (i.e., introverts vs…
Is this already the breeding ground for over selling and underperforming: Generic language in scientific communication | PNAS https://t.co/HFHVu1fWP9
RT @JCSkewesDK: PNAS: Your manuscript lacks the originality and general appeal required to be publishable in The Journal. Also PNAS: https…
RT @MaxRLambert: You Don't Say https://t.co/qxwfSRbJED
Generic language in scientific communication https://t.co/hSNn3fchUf
RT @callin_bull: The best thing about this article is that it bemoans the unjustified use of generic language in scientific writing, leadin…