Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/m26PdFPk6t
A strong proposal to redefine p value to p<0.005 https://t.co/qUr9BpUbei Redefine statistical significance
RT @MarkTabNet: Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour (top science journal) https://t.co/4ogQodQ5Yq
RT @MarkTabNet: Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour (top science journal) https://t.co/4ogQodQ5Yq
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour (top science journal) https://t.co/RYxtpiIZRP #machinelearning #tech
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour (top science journal) https://t.co/4ogQodQ5Yq
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/IWnxMVX63l
RT @SauChin_Chen: 重訂統計顯著水準的建議這個月正式發表,評論"Justifying, not Redefining, Alpha"預印本9/18正式上線,之後也會在同一本期刊發表。 https://t.co/xrPmKHbzoh
RT @peeplaja: "We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005" https://t.co/yCFtEDS3le
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/bAsoPIdXn9
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/vG2c98jy8a
RT @briandavidearp: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/wvvW4wpD9m
重訂統計顯著水準的建議這個月正式發表,評論"Justifying, not Redefining, Alpha"預印本9/18正式上線,之後也會在同一本期刊發表。 https://t.co/xrPmKHbzoh
Default Alpha Threshold for #Pvalue to be lowered from 0.05 to 0.005-but is this enough for statistical significance?https://t.co/MhG0TARb1l
RT @briandavidearp: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/wvvW4wpD9m
RT @briandavidearp: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/wvvW4wpD9m
RT @briandavidearp: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/wvvW4wpD9m
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/wvvW4wpD9m
RT @newsycombinator: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/WBlDfr7Oro
RT @mckeowns87: https://t.co/4asbeCPsNM p=0.005, redefining statistical significance.
RT @BairdAM: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/t0BRaqpclg #research #hcsm @NatureHumBehav
"Reducing the P value threshold... is an actionable step that will immediately improve reproducibility." @nature https://t.co/YBdLRvUI8b https://t.co/rQ0W00zmUa
RT @josefslerka: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/k5ZSFsMHOT
Article in Nature "Refine statistical significance" suggests lowering alpha. Polishing a turd? https://t.co/nrAgCX33Nx
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/ZITja0kgFL comm: https://t.co/Tc7ClkL7dO
RT @peeplaja: "We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005" https://t.co/yCFtEDS3le
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/HeSqbT2WJu
Badly needed in medicine - Redefine statistical significance - https://t.co/npipFbUxyF
RT @gabimaeztu: P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 https://t.co/ZQqINkMxt3
—a pool of scientists are asking a much larger number of questions, possibly with much lower prior odds of success… https://t.co/6l6HRwTyiu
@nature Redefine Statistical Significance https://t.co/ZVvbWuwOIO #statistics
デフォルトのp値を0.05から0.005にしようぜという連名の。有意水準は一般的に5%、人文社会科学は10%、品質管理・自然科学は1%とかどっかで読んだことがある。これは0.05と設定している分野に関する提案とのこと https://t.co/SNd2qjZcNC
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/v85vnXvlF7
Lowering significance threshold to p=0.005 good idea but hard to achieve where power hard to increase (human tissue) https://t.co/Kq1c0mHwPd
RT @kevcunningham: (StatsNerdWarning): Nature: changing the P-value threshold for significance from 0.05 to 0.005 https://t.co/P5ZTX46JeD…
(StatsNerdWarning): Nature: changing the P-value threshold for significance from 0.05 to 0.005 https://t.co/P5ZTX46JeD HT: @paddycosgrave
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/00VyYWm1Ob
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/vYhHl1r7Eq (https://t.co/jP2gdlVie8)
Very good points there. Although perhaps we should focus on effects, rather than significance ... https://t.co/k55Kd0RJJG
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/2EGjaIduV0
RT @adrop: A proposal to reduce the P-value threshold for statistical significance from .05 to .005 https://t.co/cO6CCIszxf
RT @t_lienart: Another stone in the silly pond of statistical significance: https://t.co/83mRw2qNzl
"Redefine statistical significance" .005 P-value [pdf] https://t.co/0thF0UyCRy via @normanrosner Google Play #ABtest only provides 0.1 :(
RT nilanp: Lets move the p value for scientific journalism to 0.005 https://t.co/CEx2nOUj3s https://t.co/cSryAXrvgE
RT @nilanp: Lets move the p value for scientific journalism to 0.005 https://t.co/W3udMJcySS https://t.co/z7tKRKaAmc
RT @kmelve: Lær kidsa signifikans. https://t.co/yPZzmAz7Vy
I quite like this. Now if we can start publishing null results and negative results, that would be great. https://t.co/kB88Tpb0XD
RT @gabimaeztu: P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 https://t.co/ZQqINkMxt3
Hear, hear. https://t.co/zLVemjNgfp
https://t.co/tupMr8ZfFF Redefine statistical significance
that's a lot of authors.. do you think they did straws on who got to go first/last? https://t.co/y33tb4WYgl
tl;dr: In the natural and social sciences, evidence for an alternative hypothesis to a null hypothesis is... https://t.co/kDzzx6ygII
Instead of fixing the underlying problem, we can kick the can down the road a little bit ... it works for congress right? https://t.co/dV81UEIHpr
One practical solution towards reproducible research. p = 0.005 may not be ideal, but definitely easier for non-statisticians to use https://t.co/sf8XwVH5pM
#TechNews #trending Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/4iitWYlkm0
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/Y0JlseFjO2 (https://t.co/lDRSVFJ17j)
Redefine statistical significance: from p=0.05 to p=0.005 https://t.co/Cb8pVmymZk
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/PNRdO1EcnP Vía newsycombinator
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/jClZMXNe2j
Redefine statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries https://t.co/MkszEJiPXR https://t.co/BuoKUjindV
Good luck with this new threshold proposal... https://t.co/M9WOct14Zi
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/6D2HczU0Xb
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/k5ZSFsMHOT
RT @gabimaeztu: P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 https://t.co/ZQqINkMxt3
RT @nilanp: Lets move the p value for scientific journalism to 0.005 https://t.co/W3udMJcySS https://t.co/z7tKRKaAmc
Another stone in the silly pond of statistical significance: https://t.co/83mRw2qNzl
La distribución del conocimiento humano en función del tiempo va a presentar repentinamente un índice de curtosis negativo. https://t.co/mivMAKNFJh
RT @peeplaja: "We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005" https://t.co/yCFtEDS3le
RT @gabimaeztu: P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 https://t.co/ZQqINkMxt3
P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 https://t.co/ZQqINkMxt3
Lets move the p value for scientific journalism to 0.005 https://t.co/CEx2nOUj3s https://t.co/cSryAXrvgE
RT @peeplaja: "We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005" https://t.co/yCFtEDS3le
Lets move the p value for scientific journalism to 0.005 https://t.co/W3udMJcySS https://t.co/z7tKRKaAmc
"We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005" https://t.co/yCFtEDS3le
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/bKnDVTfkDc #tech #startups https://t.co/ErtuJJoLHi
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/TwSEJoo7Bz #tech #startups https://t.co/DUMBQV1eUA
Lær kidsa signifikans. https://t.co/yPZzmAz7Vy
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/XonCxI8xK5
"Redefine statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005" https://t.co/wjdFo0Hylx Standard for "discovery" in physics is 5 sigma (p<0.0000003)
Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/KEMm83gX21 ( https://t.co/Rd8U6vSo1e )
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/tP5DvJGxXp (https://t.co/Wx8LCkZYER)
RT @5amStartups: In the age of big data, maybe it's time to redefine statistical significance? I think so. #data https://t.co/EcZzOwQBqw
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/BdET6947Sm
RT @clairvoyant_the: infosecnews_bot: Redefine statistical significance - https://t.co/7dJZR4flHD #infosec #CyberSecurity
infosecnews_bot: Redefine statistical significance - https://t.co/7dJZR4flHD #infosec #CyberSecurity
RT @infosecnews_bot: Redefine statistical significance - https://t.co/bibQDT8JmD #infosec #CyberSecurity
In the age of big data, maybe it's time to redefine statistical significance? I think so. #data https://t.co/48bKN0uQJ8
@StatModeling Curious if you've seen this yet and have any thoughts? https://t.co/dRAYPVe7st
In the age of big data, maybe it's time to redefine statistical significance? I think so. #data https://t.co/EcZzOwQBqw
Is p < 0.05 = stat sign a given? Nope. Fisher just whipped it up. You can change it. These authors claim we must: https://t.co/P8RAcFcGCt
RT @mckeowns87: https://t.co/4asbeCPsNM p=0.005, redefining statistical significance.
https://t.co/4asbeCPsNM p=0.005, redefining statistical significance.
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/nlO3Ma1rU0 (https://t.co/BWQSKXS9Ky)
https://t.co/dRAYPVe7st Seems to me this just shifts the problem from too many Type I errors to too many Type II errors. Just go Bayesian.
Redefining statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 => Animal experiments are about to get A LOT more expensive. https://t.co/Xk4LcerJc7
A much-needed adjustment to what we consider statistically significant in the sciences https://t.co/iISi88P7i0