RT @berutaki: 少し前に話題になった統計的有意の閾値をp<0.05からp<0.005に下げようという提案.ワッツ、モルガン、ウィンシップ、シエ等の大物社会学者からC.ヤングの若手ホープまで共著者になっているのね.社会学の研究実践にどんな影響があるだろうか.https…
RT @berutaki: 少し前に話題になった統計的有意の閾値をp<0.05からp<0.005に下げようという提案.ワッツ、モルガン、ウィンシップ、シエ等の大物社会学者からC.ヤングの若手ホープまで共著者になっているのね.社会学の研究実践にどんな影響があるだろうか.https…
RT @berutaki: 少し前に話題になった統計的有意の閾値をp<0.05からp<0.005に下げようという提案.ワッツ、モルガン、ウィンシップ、シエ等の大物社会学者からC.ヤングの若手ホープまで共著者になっているのね.社会学の研究実践にどんな影響があるだろうか.https…
少し前に話題になった統計的有意の閾値をp<0.05からp<0.005に下げようという提案.ワッツ、モルガン、ウィンシップ、シエ等の大物社会学者からC.ヤングの若手ホープまで共著者になっているのね.社会学の研究実践にどんな影響があるだろうか.https://t.co/6VloHNuWZH
https://t.co/SU6ni5SgDg Redefine statistical significance
RT @leeswijzer: [欹耳袋]アノ「p値」論文が出ていた:Nature Human Behaviour | 70 authors. Redefine statistical significance. https://t.co/0bZCOFcxGB
RT @leeswijzer: [欹耳袋]アノ「p値」論文が出ていた:Nature Human Behaviour | 70 authors. Redefine statistical significance. https://t.co/0bZCOFcxGB
RT @leeswijzer: [欹耳袋]アノ「p値」論文が出ていた:Nature Human Behaviour | 70 authors. Redefine statistical significance. https://t.co/0bZCOFcxGB
[欹耳袋]アノ「p値」論文が出ていた:Nature Human Behaviour | 70 authors. Redefine statistical significance. https://t.co/0bZCOFcxGB
Paper proposes to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims... https://t.co/oTOJ5BaS2G
Ngakak sampe 0.005 😂 https://t.co/deKqW7V1q2
RT @AriaGhora: Perubahan dari 0.05 menjadi 0.005 tida akan menghalangi ummat untuk berlomba-lomba menuju ridho-Nya~ https://t.co/H3pGkqMrNo
Perubahan dari 0.05 menjadi 0.005 tida akan menghalangi ummat untuk berlomba-lomba menuju ridho-Nya~ https://t.co/H3pGkqMrNo
@ClausWilke Actually, perhaps it should be < .005 https://t.co/JgIeMdxI4W
RT @SFRBM: Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/AQr4mZMEWN via @NatureNews @LucianaHannibal
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/AQr4mZMEWN via @NatureNews @LucianaHannibal
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/SBnMbFkJEb https://t.co/uFOMq9005R
Redefine statistical significance #FrohlichLabIsReading https://t.co/X0yDWKUFEZ
RT @AndersPerner: Yes! Too many false positive findings result in unreproducible results, waste in research and lost opportunities https://…
RT @AndersPerner: Yes! Too many false positive findings result in unreproducible results, waste in research and lost opportunities https://…
RT @MortenHylander: Redefine statistical significance?? https://t.co/19MUYc7aZ8 Redefine statistical significance
Yes! Too many false positive findings result in unreproducible results, waste in research and lost opportunities https://t.co/2m3YeBsDB3
@bovanko @Psefolog A i ova rasprava (ne znam jesi vidio vec): https://t.co/DmMpaPmxev i https://t.co/r8lXTw7dEJ
Redefine statistical significance. https://t.co/TdrU6vSK3i
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/MKC3b1AVnO @NatureHumBehav
https://t.co/xg1vlsRJhh Proposal to change the default #Pvalue threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new…
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/3QhHYHZtQo
RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.co/wMsYugc2op https://t.co/vw6rvYBxUv
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/X0J3cTpmaQ
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
@janvandenbulck this is sooooo 2016 See https://t.co/za8Y3pcBHW and our response https://t.co/GaLtKrkyGx
RT @PolPsyISPP: New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https:…
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Cochrane_ACE: Redefine statistical significance-Should we change the default P-value threshold from 0.05➡️0.005? #CochraneEvidence http…
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
Students on #UoWcog_Res Should we increase the threshold of significance?: https://t.co/6vsDnC1q8Z
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/MjFr5qIBlU
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @PolPsyISPP: New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https:…
Fascinating read via @kyletsp. Should we change significant p-value from 0.05 to 0.005 for new discoveries? https://t.co/uJAYtevJZt
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
“Redefine Statistical Significance: Very interesting……..thoughts? https://t.co/ZKGRuheDAO
New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://t.co/3J8sFScOXS
RT @Cochrane_ACE: Redefine statistical significance-Should we change the default P-value threshold from 0.05➡️0.005? #CochraneEvidence http…
Redefine statistical significance-Should we change the default P-value threshold from 0.05➡️0.005? #CochraneEvidence https://t.co/uIBoe0VpaP
RT @lfaliajn: Redéfinir le seuil de significativité en passant de .05 à .005. Via @VGautron https://t.co/1Toyw0VnY9
RT @lfaliajn: Redéfinir le seuil de significativité en passant de .05 à .005. Via @VGautron https://t.co/1Toyw0VnY9
RT @Drug_Evidence: Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
RT @drAAmaldonado: Is P-value0.05 acceptable4 #plasticsurgery 21century-clinicalresearch?ConsideringTHISidea @prsjournal @DrRodRohrich http…
Is P-value0.05 acceptable4 #plasticsurgery 21century-clinicalresearch?ConsideringTHISidea @prsjournal @DrRodRohrich https://t.co/EXPa6y1i3m
What should constitute "statistical significance"? And should the criteria be stringent? https://t.co/jywNyG8cB2
https://t.co/jFlLVaOOuo Redefine statistical significance
RT @mikel_maria: Is it time to lower the accepted p-value for statistical "significance"? new pub in @nature https://t.co/RzxbaEuB9N
This would be a bold step forward in choosing effective therapies https://t.co/bckvuM1u68 Redefine statistical significance
RT @Drug_Evidence: Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
RT @mikel_maria: Is it time to lower the accepted p-value for statistical "significance"? new pub in @nature https://t.co/RzxbaEuB9N
@zaralynda @nature hmm I got the link to work? https://t.co/zrdjA1EGMd?
Is it time to lower the accepted p-value for statistical "significance"? new pub in @nature https://t.co/RzxbaEuB9N
To p, or not to p - #statistics #pHacking https://t.co/LVL7diRI15
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/fSlBfozaQV
Redéfinir le seuil de significativité en passant de .05 à .005. Via @VGautron https://t.co/1Toyw0VnY9
I agree with Amrhein & Greenland: simply moving the goalposts for significance will worsen P hacking, selective reporting, and pub. bias. https://t.co/KmckfWRAHa
RT @mac_anas: Redefinir la significación estadística. 70 cientificos proponen cambiar umbral de valor P de 0,05 a 0,005 para nuevos desc…
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
@jstvssr @azaidman I see your paper and raise you “Redefine statistical significance” https://t.co/gRgeiLA28H
RT @Drug_Evidence: Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
RT @mac_anas: Redefinir la significación estadística. 70 cientificos proponen cambiar umbral de valor P de 0,05 a 0,005 para nuevos desc…
RT @PolPsyISPP: New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https:…
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @TimDalgleish: P<.005 — the new p<.05? https://t.co/WAhuyxRFed
P<.005 — the new p<.05? https://t.co/WAhuyxRFed
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @fedeadolfi: 3. Justify Your Alpha: A Response to “Redefine Statistical Significance” https://t.co/laNzPrDSoY https://t.co/r4P8OpZhBr
3. Justify Your Alpha: A Response to “Redefine Statistical Significance” https://t.co/laNzPrDSoY https://t.co/r4P8OpZhBr
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
Redefinir la significación estadística. 70 cientificos proponen cambiar umbral de valor P de 0,05 a 0,005 para nuevos descubrimientos. https://t.co/U3UACmivez
Mining for truth. An increasingly rare find. https://t.co/oDRBg41zhl
Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
Interesting article: https://t.co/zrUI3Yz7Xx