RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
RT @SpringerNature: For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.c…
For #WorldStatisticsDay, read about redefining #StatisticalSignificance from an article in @NatureHumBehav: https://t.co/wMsYugc2op https://t.co/vw6rvYBxUv
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/X0J3cTpmaQ
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
@janvandenbulck this is sooooo 2016 See https://t.co/za8Y3pcBHW and our response https://t.co/GaLtKrkyGx
RT @PolPsyISPP: New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https:…
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Cochrane_ACE: Redefine statistical significance-Should we change the default P-value threshold from 0.05➡️0.005? #CochraneEvidence http…
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
Students on #UoWcog_Res Should we increase the threshold of significance?: https://t.co/6vsDnC1q8Z
Redefine statistical significance | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/MjFr5qIBlU
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @Fluid_Academy: Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
Time to redefine statistical significance: there is more than just p<0.05 https://t.co/rl7KWYPGku
RT @PolPsyISPP: New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https:…
Fascinating read via @kyletsp. Should we change significant p-value from 0.05 to 0.005 for new discoveries? https://t.co/uJAYtevJZt
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
RT @MGS_tweets: New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://…
“Redefine Statistical Significance: Very interesting……..thoughts? https://t.co/ZKGRuheDAO
New blog post, inspired by a @ReadingBioSci journal club on this paper for new P threshold https://t.co/o5g3SFUu9A https://t.co/3J8sFScOXS
RT @Cochrane_ACE: Redefine statistical significance-Should we change the default P-value threshold from 0.05➡️0.005? #CochraneEvidence http…
Redefine statistical significance-Should we change the default P-value threshold from 0.05➡️0.005? #CochraneEvidence https://t.co/uIBoe0VpaP
RT @lfaliajn: Redéfinir le seuil de significativité en passant de .05 à .005. Via @VGautron https://t.co/1Toyw0VnY9
RT @lfaliajn: Redéfinir le seuil de significativité en passant de .05 à .005. Via @VGautron https://t.co/1Toyw0VnY9
RT @Drug_Evidence: Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
RT @drAAmaldonado: Is P-value0.05 acceptable4 #plasticsurgery 21century-clinicalresearch?ConsideringTHISidea @prsjournal @DrRodRohrich http…
Is P-value0.05 acceptable4 #plasticsurgery 21century-clinicalresearch?ConsideringTHISidea @prsjournal @DrRodRohrich https://t.co/EXPa6y1i3m
What should constitute "statistical significance"? And should the criteria be stringent? https://t.co/jywNyG8cB2
https://t.co/jFlLVaOOuo Redefine statistical significance
RT @mikel_maria: Is it time to lower the accepted p-value for statistical "significance"? new pub in @nature https://t.co/RzxbaEuB9N
This would be a bold step forward in choosing effective therapies https://t.co/bckvuM1u68 Redefine statistical significance
RT @Drug_Evidence: Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
RT @mikel_maria: Is it time to lower the accepted p-value for statistical "significance"? new pub in @nature https://t.co/RzxbaEuB9N
@zaralynda @nature hmm I got the link to work? https://t.co/zrdjA1EGMd?
Is it time to lower the accepted p-value for statistical "significance"? new pub in @nature https://t.co/RzxbaEuB9N
To p, or not to p - #statistics #pHacking https://t.co/LVL7diRI15
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/fSlBfozaQV
Redéfinir le seuil de significativité en passant de .05 à .005. Via @VGautron https://t.co/1Toyw0VnY9
I agree with Amrhein & Greenland: simply moving the goalposts for significance will worsen P hacking, selective reporting, and pub. bias. https://t.co/KmckfWRAHa
RT @mac_anas: Redefinir la significación estadística. 70 cientificos proponen cambiar umbral de valor P de 0,05 a 0,005 para nuevos desc…
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
@jstvssr @azaidman I see your paper and raise you “Redefine statistical significance” https://t.co/gRgeiLA28H
RT @Drug_Evidence: Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
RT @mac_anas: Redefinir la significación estadística. 70 cientificos proponen cambiar umbral de valor P de 0,05 a 0,005 para nuevos desc…
RT @PolPsyISPP: New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https:…
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @TimDalgleish: P<.005 — the new p<.05? https://t.co/WAhuyxRFed
P<.005 — the new p<.05? https://t.co/WAhuyxRFed
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
RT @fedeadolfi: 3. Justify Your Alpha: A Response to “Redefine Statistical Significance” https://t.co/laNzPrDSoY https://t.co/r4P8OpZhBr
3. Justify Your Alpha: A Response to “Redefine Statistical Significance” https://t.co/laNzPrDSoY https://t.co/r4P8OpZhBr
RT @NatureHumBehav: Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
Two views on what to do with statistical significance https://t.co/f7fByWFxCr | https://t.co/j3KZzlwwBj
Redefinir la significación estadística. 70 cientificos proponen cambiar umbral de valor P de 0,05 a 0,005 para nuevos descubrimientos. https://t.co/U3UACmivez
Mining for truth. An increasingly rare find. https://t.co/oDRBg41zhl
Redefine statistical significance: https://t.co/JNZOHiU5xk https://t.co/PYftwlpW5j
Interesting article: https://t.co/zrUI3Yz7Xx
RT @PolPsyISPP: New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https:…
New @NatureHumBehav article proposes changing default P-value threshold (0.05) for statistical significance to 0.005 https://t.co/ikFXjWeZ8j
https://t.co/re1JDAgw3F Redefine statistical significance
Interesting insight on p-values; https://t.co/sy0uAhuyZs Redefine statistical significance
I wonder what % of results are 'suggestive' (0.005 < P < 0.05) & what % are 'really' significant in ecology papers this year following this! https://t.co/KHbaTHyhmc
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
Unless backed by rigorous peer review (and I'd argue lower p-values https://t.co/PKXhQl6Y1S ), fake is only "fake" for some version of real.
RT @5amStartups: In the age of big data, maybe it's time to redefine statistical significance? I think so. #data https://t.co/EcZzOwQBqw
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/v9Unz09IKf
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
Great thread on these two commentaries. A positive moment for the field that we can have these discussions. #stats #pvalues https://t.co/ktt6oQ7lUR
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they go…
Constructive response to the @NatureHumBehav) article on which I am one of 72 co-authors https://t.co/GPabQHsgC3 (they got 88 co-authors!) https://t.co/8WXEqWjy64
https://t.co/QgdpK2btUQ Redefine statistical significance #pvalues #science
@tz33cu I think that field should figure out the definition of significant first ;) https://t.co/AhvvPxPW34
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/axaOmtK4g2 #Technology #tech
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/aYkg4WjlNj
https://t.co/R4g7huxL5a. Parece que toca redefinir la significancia estadística. Otro de los efectos colaterales del "todo para publicar"
Tell me about it! There could be proposal/request. Makes me think of this https://t.co/F4MHW7HxFq https://t.co/B5mSa7m0ZO
Redefine statistical significance |A new proposal. https://t.co/vAYTuhplOO #statistics
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/6wiNS0IPiA #instant #feedly