| Title |
Redefine statistical significance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Benjamin, James O. Berger, Magnus Johannesson, Brian A. Nosek, E.-J. Wagenmakers, Richard Berk, Kenneth A. Bollen, Björn Brembs, Lawrence Brown, Colin Camerer, David Cesarini, Christopher D. Chambers, Merlise Clyde, Thomas D. Cook, Paul De Boeck, Zoltan Dienes, Anna Dreber, Kenny Easwaran, Charles Efferson, Ernst Fehr, Fiona Fidler, Andy P. Field, Malcolm Forster, Edward I. George, Richard Gonzalez, Steven Goodman, Edwin Green, Donald P. Green, Anthony G. Greenwald, Jarrod D. Hadfield, Larry V. Hedges, Leonhard Held, Teck Hua Ho, Herbert Hoijtink, Daniel J. Hruschka, Kosuke Imai, Guido Imbens, John P. A. Ioannidis, Minjeong Jeon, James Holland Jones, Michael Kirchler, David Laibson, John List, Roderick Little, Arthur Lupia, Edouard Machery, Scott E. Maxwell, Michael McCarthy, Don A. Moore, Stephen L. Morgan, Marcus Munafó, Shinichi Nakagawa, Brendan Nyhan, Timothy H. Parker, Luis Pericchi, Marco Perugini, Jeff Rouder, Judith Rousseau, Victoria Savalei, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Thomas Sellke, Betsy Sinclair, Dustin Tingley, Trisha Van Zandt, Simine Vazire, Duncan J. Watts, Christopher Winship, Robert L. Wolpert, Yu Xie, Cristobal Young, Jonathan Zinman, Valen E. Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 908 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 115 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 51 | 6% |
| Japan | 51 | 6% |
| Spain | 29 | 3% |
| Canada | 22 | 2% |
| Germany | 17 | 2% |
| France | 13 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 13 | 1% |
| Brazil | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 166 | 18% |
| Unknown | 420 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 665 | 73% |
| Scientists | 187 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,657 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2657 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 591 | 22% |
| Researcher | 412 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 293 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 206 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 163 | 6% |
| Other | 550 | 21% |
| Unknown | 442 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 488 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 237 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 180 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 131 | 5% |
| Other | 796 | 30% |
| Unknown | 639 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 902. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,592
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#58
of 1,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311
of 325,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 160.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.