Our analysis provides a theoretical underpinning for the proposals to reduce the significance levels used in science—such as the proposal to reduce the default significance level from 5% to 0.5% by Dan Benjamin and many others in @naturehumbehav: https:/
RT @tdienlin: In the tradition of @lakens et al's https://t.co/53ch9GItCm or https://t.co/ySKNibXv48, we set up a google doc, in which we'…
@GoldenGummo @andyspensable @J_C_A__ @Marionemmie Lis tes sources pis tu reviens hein😮💨 Tiens vu que tu dois pas bien comprendre le problème de tout miser sur une p-value avec un échantillon trop petit (Franchement ils sont cons à l'INSEE de faire des é
RT @NatureDigest: 【統計学の大物学者がP値の刷新を提案 | Natureダイジェスト】新発見の統計的有意性を評価するためには、P値の閾値は0.05から0.005に引き下げるべきであると、統計学の大家たちは主張する。この主張は9月1日にNature Human…
@mdancho84 Don’t use p<0.05 use instead p<0.005 !! https://t.co/iRrjsmIL7w
´´We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.´´ https://t.co/i04R2Gt7nM
@wwwojtekk Require p<.005 and publish 6 (truth and 5 false positives) https://t.co/v9AHPQcFXN
@vsbuffalo Decrease, right? 🙂 https://t.co/I0t25kIHgr
"We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries." 🤯🤯🤯 https://t.co/3MFoIWSeyE
やはり有意水準は0.005をデフォルトにしないと… https://t.co/TLZ2MXezNI
@samjlord @ItaiYanai 🤣 Not good enough 😇 https://t.co/to4aRZeytY
こちらの方が分かりやすい。 https://t.co/OuEeHkbnWD https://t.co/GuLhy2HYii
RT @NatureHumBehav: Redefine statistical significance - from 0.05 to 0.005 - #Comment https://t.co/eb0KLvI6vK https://t.co/vAC5basrjs
This shows the tests' assumptions don't match reality. Lowering the default p-value threshold to 0.005 (https://t.co/G2J6jMzukC) will alleviate the symptoms. But it won't fix the epistemic mismatch. We'll trade false positives for false negatives and never
“We have diverse views about how best to improve reproducibility (…) However, changing the P value threshold is simple, aligns with the training undertaken by many researchers, and might quickly achieve broad acceptance.” https://t.co/8sDY8J4nCq
RT @d_f_stone: @SpencrGreenberg In case you’re not familiar with this paper/view https://t.co/DrCs1T7sDi
RT @d_f_stone: @SpencrGreenberg In case you’re not familiar with this paper/view https://t.co/DrCs1T7sDi
RT @d_f_stone: @SpencrGreenberg In case you’re not familiar with this paper/view https://t.co/DrCs1T7sDi
@SpencrGreenberg In case you’re not familiar with this paper/view https://t.co/DrCs1T7sDi
@bjg @AugusteNahas Tah dah!!! https://t.co/jHVZPU21rY
RT @NatureJapan: 2017年 Highly-Accessed Article トップ3 in Nature Human Behaviour「Redefine statistical significance」 https://t.co/BANw2Zdl2T h…
@paulpharoah @f2harrell @AndrewPGrieve Empirical estimates suggests the null is true in around 90% of performed studies (from https://t.co/80xtiR7Ahy). https://t.co/AUp4TTLNOR
We need to be more skeptical of our own results -- especially is they look like this.
RT @BrendanNyhan: Don't spend your career mining statistical noise! Low power and the p<.05 threshold are a gruesome combination. That's wh…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Don't spend your career mining statistical noise! Low power and the p<.05 threshold are a gruesome combination. That's wh…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Don't spend your career mining statistical noise! Low power and the p<.05 threshold are a gruesome combination. That's wh…
RT @BrendanNyhan: Don't spend your career mining statistical noise! Low power and the p<.05 threshold are a gruesome combination. That's wh…
Don't spend your career mining statistical noise! Low power and the p<.05 threshold are a gruesome combination. That's why we recommended p<.005 to limit false positives https://t.co/EfF071abcG
【2022/7/15 開催レポート】 統計学的な有意差が必ずしも生物学的意味をもつわけではない。という点について、p値の意味やp-hacking、疑似反復、有意水準といった単語と絡めて話しました。また、最近の動向(添付リンク)や統計モデルによる推論といった提案も行いました。 https://t.co/DbVch2KHT6
If the conventional level of statistical significance for new discoveries were changed to .005 from .05 (which was suggested*), in my opinion ... (1/3) * https://t.co/YOhVDJzfdt
The three most cited articles in NHB are actually two perspectives and one comment. I think all of them are non-citable and therefore inflate the impact factor (but I'm not 100% sure about these). https://t.co/4MKnq9u4K6 https://t.co/ktohdt8BI8 https://t.c
RT @mathiaswullum: The funny thing is that programmatic Open Science papers boosted NHB's IF from the start: https://t.co/n84M3Gxf7D https…
The funny thing is that programmatic Open Science papers boosted NHB's IF from the start: https://t.co/n84M3Gxf7D https://t.co/yccpFAF4ZD https://t.co/XTkObJnzed
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
@Ilanim67 @vamrhein @FredBarraquand @Trends_Ecol_Evo there was the widely discussed paper that suggested to lower significance to 0.005 https://t.co/cDeT3r8t2k and of course they consider that there are cost (lowering power / increasing sample size) for th
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
The debate goes on. Part of the problem is that the false positive probability (resulting in failed replication) depends on other things in addition to the P-value and so different P-values required for different studies with different powers and differen
RT @leticiakawano: What about that #epitwitter? ;-) https://t.co/ud2raGDL3X
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
What about that #epitwitter? ;-)
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
RT @GuyattGH: Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of…
Very high proportion of articles reporting p < 0.05 and associated replication crisis have prompted calls for #threshold p of 0.005, ask researchers to justify threshold p. Better is abandon threshold p altogether, estimation only. https://t.co/fWZgWnVX
@NeuroPolarbear @bradpwyble @WiringTheBrain @neuralreckoning @atypical_me @KordingLab @Raamana_ @tyrell_turing @andpru @R3RT0 @katjaQheuer @OHBM @IpNeuro I tend to subjectively agree with this, but then again we have conventions on when we make the cut for
Journals can help transition to the new statistical significance threshold. Authors and readers can take the initiative by describing and interpreting results more appropriately in light of the new proposed definition of statistical significance. https://t
@DrCathyCorbin I do! FWIW, I have colleagues who think this is way too stringent/not necessary. https://t.co/bqSRH2kfQX
RT @RubinPsyc: (1) Low statistical standards of evidence “Statistical standards of evidence for claiming new discoveries in many fields of…
(1) Low statistical standards of evidence “Statistical standards of evidence for claiming new discoveries in many fields of science are simply too low” (Benjamin et al., 2018). https://t.co/nUe08gfZtB
RT @ho_ben: @KiraboJackson Our former colleague Dan Benjamin has been pushing us to use .005 p values and makes a compelling case. The chan…
We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https://t.co/i04R2Gt7nM
Comment Published: 01 September 2017 Redefine statistical significance Daniel J. Benjamin, James O. Berger, […]Valen E. Johnson Nature Human Behaviour volume 2, pages6–10 (2018)Cite this article https://t.co/i04R2Gt7nM
https://t.co/i04R2Gt7nM ´´We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.´´ 2018
https://t.co/i04R2Gt7nM Redefine statistical significance Daniel J. Benjamin, James O. Berger, […]Valen E. Johnson Nature Human Behaviour volume 2, pages6–10 (2018)
´´One of the 72 authors, Christopher Chambers, is a member of the Advisory Board of Nature Human Behaviour. Christopher Chambers was not a corresponding author and did not communicate with the editors regarding the publication of this article.´´https://t.c
https://t.co/i04R2Gt7nM Redefine statistical significance Daniel J. Benjamin, James O. Berger, […]Valen E. Johnson Nature Human Behaviour volume 2, pages6–10 (2018)Cite this article 135k Accesses