RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Vamos aumentar as amostras. https://t.co/A7vDMQCNua
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
In the next few years we may accept only a p-value of 0.000 https://t.co/eHyF0S1E4C
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @hangingnoodles: "statistical significance has ruined empirical…economics" Deirdre McCloskey https://t.co/eeOUV0YEzV ht @FriedrichHayek…
RT @AnMailleach: Change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https:…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https://t.co/2LopdzuqOg
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @lolu_adeniran: Can we just admit that we're all driving blind https://t.co/2Xvbnmpx5e
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
"statistical significance has ruined empirical…economics" Deirdre McCloskey https://t.co/eeOUV0YEzV ht @FriedrichHayek https://t.co/XC6TDfSHMw
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Problem: arbitrary threshold is arbitrary. Solution: pick a different arbitrary threshold??? https://t.co/rUepicBXXZ
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
I'd much rather science focused on moving away from threshold p-values, as advocated by the ASA last year. In some ways, this is already what is done by writers and readers in fields (such as econ hist) that often have to rely on "small data". https://t.co
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Can we just admit that we're all driving blind https://t.co/2Xvbnmpx5e
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Check it out!! https://t.co/I7Q7kXC40V
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of .005 instead of .05 https://t.co/jW3aGYyQ95
Guess I will be using p-values less than 0.005 now https://t.co/XXgMN7NwqU
p<0.005にしても変わらないような。Bayes factorにすれば良いのに。 https://t.co/s10AKbrr4m Redefine statistical significance
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @elbuhodelblog: La que se puede organizar... https://t.co/Lvnl2q51KD
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @elbuhodelblog: La que se puede organizar... https://t.co/Lvnl2q51KD
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
La que se puede organizar... https://t.co/Lvnl2q51KD
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https://t.co/vue7Asd2Ak
Jan 2017 #ScienceEcon #RedefiningStatisticalSignificance #BenjaminEtAl2017 : change #Pvalue threshold .05 -> .005 https://t.co/TPOBhFfHb3
We all know there is a problem with false positive findings - more stringent requirements for evidence definitely help https://t.co/uO0vXmKHVm
RT @DoctorOLab: I’m all for it but this will work only if study section @NIHgrants enforces it (like SABV) and promote grants with smaller…
I’m all for it but this will work only if study section @NIHgrants enforces it (like SABV) and promote grants with smaller number of experiments that have 2x sample size and PI with track record of properly sampled experiments. If not it will fail. https:
Redefine statistical significance: We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https://t.co/pHQSvTpxbL
Redefine statistical significance https://t.co/1kJBN8SvCS
The the default P-value threshold for statistical significance should be reduced from 0.05 to 0.005 to improve reproducibility of research and reduce the rate of false positive. https://t.co/HUow3Hf8jf
RT @spenafajuri: More discussion on statistical significance. The key is to report effect sizes and confidence intervals and address biases…
RT @spenafajuri: More discussion on statistical significance. The key is to report effect sizes and confidence intervals and address biases…
RT @spenafajuri: More discussion on statistical significance. The key is to report effect sizes and confidence intervals and address biases…
RT @spenafajuri: More discussion on statistical significance. The key is to report effect sizes and confidence intervals and address biases…
More discussion on statistical significance. The key is to report effect sizes and confidence intervals and address biases carefully. P-values are not the most important part https://t.co/UvLnIv2EMX
RT @NatureDigest: 【統計学の大物学者がP値の刷新を提案 | Natureダイジェスト】新発見の統計的有意性を評価するためには、P値の閾値は0.05から0.005に引き下げるべきであると、統計学の大家たちは主張する。この主張は9月1日にNature Human…
RT @NatureDigest: 【統計学の大物学者がP値の刷新を提案 | Natureダイジェスト】新発見の統計的有意性を評価するためには、P値の閾値は0.05から0.005に引き下げるべきであると、統計学の大家たちは主張する。この主張は9月1日にNature Human…
RT @NatureDigest: 【統計学の大物学者がP値の刷新を提案 | Natureダイジェスト】新発見の統計的有意性を評価するためには、P値の閾値は0.05から0.005に引き下げるべきであると、統計学の大家たちは主張する。この主張は9月1日にNature Human…
https://t.co/xzFmhUQXYl Redefine statistical significance
Ni todo es todo P ni todo nada P. https://t.co/A7Hmg5Wgm4.
Redéfinir le significativité statistique: le p<0,005 devrait être la nouvelle norme via @nature https://t.co/SC2W9fQKla Redefine statistical significance
On p-value. Nice idea, but getting biologists more comfy with stats is crucial - my sci is better since doing some R https://t.co/NJzTAPoGew
RT @NatureDigest: 【統計学の大物学者がP値の刷新を提案 | Natureダイジェスト】新発見の統計的有意性を評価するためには、P値の閾値は0.05から0.005に引き下げるべきであると、統計学の大家たちは主張する。この主張は9月1日にNature Human…
RT @NatureDigest: 【統計学の大物学者がP値の刷新を提案 | Natureダイジェスト】新発見の統計的有意性を評価するためには、P値の閾値は0.05から0.005に引き下げるべきであると、統計学の大家たちは主張する。この主張は9月1日にNature Human…
RT @NatureDigest: 【統計学の大物学者がP値の刷新を提案 | Natureダイジェスト】新発見の統計的有意性を評価するためには、P値の閾値は0.05から0.005に引き下げるべきであると、統計学の大家たちは主張する。この主張は9月1日にNature Human…