RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @dev_a_patel: Problem: arbitrary threshold is arbitrary. Solution: pick a different arbitrary threshold??? https://t.co/rUepicBXXZ
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
それなりの例数集めればP値は大概5%以下になるからな。 https://t.co/nayeywS4zY
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @AnMailleach: Change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https:…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Redefine statistical significance - to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries #research #Analysis #Statistics @nresearchnews @NatureHumBehav https://t.co/0RBwdfPueN
名前が多い https://t.co/PgzVnoUK4y
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Vamos aumentar as amostras. https://t.co/A7vDMQCNua
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @1959Harvard: 有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
有意水準を5%から0.5%への変更を呼びかけ。自然科学ではね。経済の実証分析でこの基準導入したら実証系論文数激減必至。 https://t.co/bMDkFIUEy9
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
In the next few years we may accept only a p-value of 0.000 https://t.co/eHyF0S1E4C
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @hangingnoodles: "statistical significance has ruined empirical…economics" Deirdre McCloskey https://t.co/eeOUV0YEzV ht @FriedrichHayek…
RT @AnMailleach: Change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https:…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries. https://t.co/2LopdzuqOg
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @lolu_adeniran: Can we just admit that we're all driving blind https://t.co/2Xvbnmpx5e
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
"statistical significance has ruined empirical…economics" Deirdre McCloskey https://t.co/eeOUV0YEzV ht @FriedrichHayek https://t.co/XC6TDfSHMw
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Problem: arbitrary threshold is arbitrary. Solution: pick a different arbitrary threshold??? https://t.co/rUepicBXXZ
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
I'd much rather science focused on moving away from threshold p-values, as advocated by the ASA last year. In some ways, this is already what is done by writers and readers in fields (such as econ hist) that often have to rely on "small data". https://t.co
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Can we just admit that we're all driving blind https://t.co/2Xvbnmpx5e
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
Check it out!! https://t.co/I7Q7kXC40V
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
RT @bill_easterly: The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of…
The crisis on the lack of reproducibility of studies spurs call for redefining statistical significance with P-value of .005 instead of .05 https://t.co/jW3aGYyQ95
Guess I will be using p-values less than 0.005 now https://t.co/XXgMN7NwqU
p<0.005にしても変わらないような。Bayes factorにすれば良いのに。 https://t.co/s10AKbrr4m Redefine statistical significance
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @elbuhodelblog: La que se puede organizar... https://t.co/Lvnl2q51KD
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @elbuhodelblog: La que se puede organizar... https://t.co/Lvnl2q51KD
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…
RT @emulenews: Redefine statistical significance. We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05…