| Title |
A native function for RAN translation and CGG repeats in regulating fragile X protein synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-020-0590-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caitlin M. Rodriguez, Shannon E. Wright, Michael G. Kearse, Jill M. Haenfler, Brittany N. Flores, Yu Liu, Marius F. Ifrim, Mary R. Glineburg, Amy Krans, Paymaan Jafar-Nejad, Michael A. Sutton, Gary J. Bassell, Jack M. Parent, Frank Rigo, Sami J. Barmada, Peter K. Todd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 40% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 59% |
| Scientists | 26 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#378,196
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#691
of 5,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,893
of 382,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#18
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.