@tomaspueyo this one really sends the point home hahaha https://t.co/FeCmpjlbvw
@lives_of_riley @bentaylor42 @HarryHamishGray Remember: parachutes don’t prevent death or serious injury either. Damn gravity. https://t.co/qlPcP56NHM
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
The PARACHUTE trial satirically highlights some of the limitations of randomized controlled trials https://t.co/ugGfCYKGFq
RT @ewyler: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | The BMJ https://t.co/…
RT @rwyeh: BREAKING NEWS!!! In the first ever randomized clinical trial, we demonstrated that parachutes did NOT prevent death or major in…
RT @ewyler: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | The BMJ https://t.co/…
RT @rwyeh: BREAKING NEWS!!! In the first ever randomized clinical trial, we demonstrated that parachutes did NOT prevent death or major in…
😂😂😂. that this is a real peer-reviewed paper is both hilarious and a bit disconcerting. of course this one is a bit tongue in cheek so you can immediately find out why it's not saying what you think it's saying but izo zingine it's hard to know esp if it's
@F3ZZk @LadyDoctorSays Here you go. BMJ 2018. Participants were randomized to get a parachute or an empty “placebo” backpack. https://t.co/4HsbaWB5cE
RT @rwyeh: BREAKING NEWS!!! In the first ever randomized clinical trial, we demonstrated that parachutes did NOT prevent death or major in…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
@LadyDoctorSays There’s research backing this up https://t.co/PHWVRXGjnt
@jmcrookston @pacounchained Absolutely! You caught this, I take it--? I thought of you when I saw it: https://t.co/BT4wgc3Sai
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
@FredPlais Fun fact: According to a study and the key results there’s no evidence parachute made any difference at all while jumping from an airplane 😉 https://t.co/7Jx0Zru6Tl
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
@ACLU I’m losing all respect for ‘research’ when the outcomes are complete nonsense. Scientists having zero common sense. Reminds me of this parody study: https://t.co/nryzHokDfF😂
This is one of those paper where you just laugh🤣🤣🤣https://t.co/Ju9Xv9w9vP https://t.co/wFasmUU9Xw
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | The BMJ https://t.co/HjxivDGeAP
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
@Dunc_Disorderly @rutheday99 @msftbob @LouiseElliot19 Again you are conflating "Most accurate set of data" with "accurate data". For example this, first of its kind, parachute study suggests that the dangers of jumping from a plane are no different with
RT @KaminskiMed: to those who got confused by recent (💯flawed) #CochraneReview #Masks paper & as public service announcement to all others…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
Somebody should tell Bret “masks don’t work” Stephens about this important study. RCT = gold standard science! Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/YV8CRRXfRz
to those who got confused by recent (💯flawed) #CochraneReview #Masks paper & as public service announcement to all others - reposting the classic 2018 #BMJ paper. The gist - if there’s a respiratory pathogen pandemic - don’t hesitate #MaskUp #BetterSaf
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
"Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention" h/t @tpoholmes https://t.co/fOvBikNDS5
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
A huge discovery. Might share the methodology with the recent publication showing that masks during pandemics were useless: https://t.co/RERno8iesC
That was not what I expected. https://t.co/vsjYRWSSif
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
This is brilliant https://t.co/uJ02DjzfJ5
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
@rebeccawatson @drjudymelinek Sounds similar to:
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @rwyeh: BREAKING NEWS!!! In the first ever randomized clinical trial, we demonstrated that parachutes did NOT prevent death or major in…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
Saw this on my timeline: a published, peer-reviewed study showing no difference in wearing or not wearing parachutes when leaping from airplanes. Note to mask doubters- study design matters https://t.co/yvbFuKCVY4
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
@angie_rasmussen @joaquinlife @JReinerMD @EricTopol
For those who are citing that recent Cochrane study on masking and claim that masking does not work, you may find this useful https://t.co/PHWVRXGjnt
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
@c0nc0rdance @LindaILH Every statistical researcher in the world should read this paper on day one of their course, and again every day afterwards. https://t.co/Lt1ZI3pPlh https://t.co/AXqjcySLy3
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @poppy_haze: There are some things in medical science that are considered prima facie correct and not in need of study. Like this rando…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…