RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
Accepted and embraced by ALL major medical organizations @AmerAcadPeds #medtwitter @MattWalshBlog #psychtwitter @pittparents #TranswomanAreConMen
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
Intellectual humility at its best. “However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps.”
RT @peterboghossian: Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major tr…
Absolutely mind blowing peer-reviewed paper: Objective: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major traumatic injury when jumping from an aircraft. https://t.co/G38iOCo3zn
@SteveCurryMD My second favorite study! My favorite one is this https://t.co/6JJCH2Q9Pa
@madforfree @LaVeritaWeb Nemmeno l'efficacia del paracadute è mai stata dimostrata. https://t.co/R7TwA6gSXo
https://t.co/4IFeSmKBmF I love this. So much. A randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of parachute use. (Really, it's a satirical lesson on not just reading the abstract of a paper, but to analyze its methods too)
@ciro_negrin @endocrinorosero Ummm, no. Para ilustrarlo mejor: https://t.co/AjiQzFuT9l en algunos contextos el diseño de un ensayo clínico controlado puede ser incluso en contra de la ética.
【論文=全て正しいのか??】 🔻飛行機から飛び降りる時に パラシュートをつけても 死亡や重症外傷を予防しない https://t.co/REJKZArtVK ✅4月になり新卒の人達は論文等を 読む事が多くなると思いますが、 中身を読まないとこうなります。と… 有名ジャーナルが教えてくれてます^^ 👇 #おかべん https://t.co/P697VPSwlI
@DurgaPrasannaM1 @EricTopol @TheEconomist We actually have RCT evidence that parachutes DON'T prevent death or major injuries while jumping from a flying aircraft (admittedly flying VERY low & slow): https://t.co/o0GLY6EYsF Editorial by the authors: h
RT @nylerodgers: @FemmeFaeTali @StacyCaySlays There *is* a randomized, non blinded trial which found no benefit to wearing a parachute* tho…
@StacyCaySlays @FemmeFaeTali not gonna lie, when I saw you mention a study about parachutes, I was expecting this one: https://t.co/YAYEdltHYH
@FemmeFaeTali @StacyCaySlays Actually, there is : https://t.co/mUpYaWlPkP
無作為化比較試験にかけられたことがないのでパラシュートが機能するという証拠はなかったと述べています。”エビデンスに基づく医療の擁護者は観察データのみを用いて評価された(パラシュートの)採用を批判しています”。つまり、観察研究も適切な文脈であれば重要なのです。 https://t.co/XHZIncRVwd
RT @nylerodgers: @FemmeFaeTali @StacyCaySlays There *is* a randomized, non blinded trial which found no benefit to wearing a parachute* tho…
@FemmeFaeTali @StacyCaySlays There *is* a randomized, non blinded trial which found no benefit to wearing a parachute* though! https://t.co/fVoheBEGS3 * Unfortunately all potential participants located on planes that were in flight declined to participate
@mr_osiak It’s a matter neither of consensus nor evidence - but principle. Children are people, people are individuals and every individual learns individually. Seeking anything “rock-solid” here will never persuade the political…not even peer reviewed s
@cjsnowdon Or just produce the right data. https://t.co/9GKFCNWJY2
"Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial" https://t.co/u6QiKyQZP5
Erinnert mich an das hier… https://t.co/6JAW9JYerS
@krlntpd But there is one! I even referenced it in the article: https://t.co/hDbEaxthhY
@jrdblades @ianmSC @GrantAcosta5 Nah. Here is a study that says parachutes don't prevent death. These masks studies are worth exactly the same thing. Masks only work if you wear them. People in the studies cited didn't wear them. That's what it shows. http
@cjsnowdon You do know parachutes don’t actually “reduce death or major injury” right? 🤪 https://t.co/GJPhnau5e5
@Timcast Fun fact: there’s also limited published peer-reviewed evidence that parachutes are effective. https://t.co/e5oBggr7VP
@blaubeerblue86 Sorry, richtiger Link: https://t.co/RxjDm7wyze Unbedingt figure 2 beachten!
RT @WolfmannotJack: @MBerghaeuser Ahem. Es gibt ein RCT zu Fallschirmen. 🤭🥸 https://t.co/fp8HU1sZOM
@bobreeduk @theJeremyVine Here is a study to demonstrate why context, variables and compounding factors are important. On face value it will seem jumping off planes with or without parachutes make no difference to mortality : https://t.co/gUkYAfOa6N
@MBerghaeuser Ahem. Es gibt ein RCT zu Fallschirmen. 🤭🥸 https://t.co/fp8HU1sZOM
@MartMichaelis @Friedemann1 Ahem. Für Fallschirme gab’s dieses RCT. 🥸🤓🤭 https://t.co/fp8HU1sZOM
@janipewter @JuceeRob @TBStevesPix @CyclingFallacy I reckon this is applicable https://t.co/qzAlwwyq9x
@OliverCarl @aroc_igng @dokhollidays Es gibt tatsächlich noch ein RCT zum Thema! https://t.co/MsMyRLWgVv
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
Actually there is a RCT on parachutes and it concluded they are ineffective. May have been some issues with the study design. I give you: https://t.co/f8aK8CHaua
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
Science as it should be 😐
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @DethVeggie: https://t.co/fQ006dA4UJ This is genius.
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
If you ever want to explain the problems with “evidence based” medicine. Brilliant.
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @DethVeggie: https://t.co/fQ006dA4UJ This is genius.
RT @DethVeggie: https://t.co/fQ006dA4UJ This is genius.
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
https://t.co/fQ006dA4UJ This is genius.
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
Love the Christmas BMJ funnies, but this hits different after that Cochrane mask review. 🙄
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
Lol what a ways to go for a joke! https://t.co/8C8QIh8Y96
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/aBxbQhhMAg
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
Gotta use this in #IB #TheoryOfKnowledge
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @RottenInDenmark: lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
lmaoooo incredible troll https://t.co/Af8k8geqCp
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
@PaulRKeeble @kirstler31 @ShaneyWright Of course it is, but different groups of people are responsible for the long-term financial health of a company manufacturing a drug (for an example) than for getting the drug through the R&D stage and into the ma
@PChandr43659403 @ViroLIEgy @SophicManatee @Fckelonmusk1 @sense_strand @Debunk_the_Funk @dan_gadd @ValZimmer2 @JamieAA_Again @richdatasci @THC1001 @AsymetricTrades @jason_willz1 @Censored4sure @rt7683 @Alec_Zeck (Though, admittedly, it's entirely possible
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/I8guVirHCe
@christapeterso At least we have good quality randomized controlled trials on Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: results Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury (0% for parachute v 0% for co
@TRyanGregory @drjudymelinek The RCT for parachutes found no benefit! (Actually conducted, for real, using standard best-practice protocols, which didn't keep them from limiting the study to people in aircraft at an altitude of five feet or less.) https://
@dissent831 @TracyBethHoeg @VPrasadMDMPH They are very explicitly asking for low quality evidence when we already have much better evidence at our disposal. https://t.co/8Z13oXODD9
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…