RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
RT @dgurdasani1: Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, w…
Recommend reading these: https://t.co/VyZ513mLWJ https://t.co/BaDaeBsVtF From people far more knowledgable in the area, who understand why RCTs aren't appropriate here, and explain it really well.
@Falko84139338 @MarkusL32078761 Nope, sie verstehen die cochrane Studie einfach nicht. https://t.co/aj299rV2zT
@Enno_1981 @MarkusL32078761 Jo und Fallschirme helfen auch nicht https://t.co/vPjn2qIDwV
(Second pic from https://t.co/zYK9aBtBbp) https://t.co/kwpFkloSoX
Funny and makes an important point.
RT @EmilBergholtz: @DrJBhattacharya You can make the same obviously flawed case against parachutes https://t.co/74oNSLYNyZ
@DrJBhattacharya You can make the same obviously flawed case against parachutes https://t.co/74oNSLYNyZ
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
Fabuleux !
Les parachutes c’est comme les élastiques, c’est pour les fiottes. 💪#soldat1ereclassesportextreme
quoient
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
RT @astropierre: L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT P…
L'étude scientifique du week-end : Cet essai randomisé REVOLUTIONNAIRE montre que l'utilisation du parachute NE REDUIT PAS le nombre de décès ou de blessures traumatiques majeures lors du saut d'un avion (au sol et immobile). 😁 Le papier dans BMJ : htt
Une étude encadrée par l’IHU de Marseille ?
@Anthony_in_DC @AWokeZombie @kerpen Can you provide an RCT that parachutes work? 🤡
@5thRateDuelist Yeah, it's just manipulating the data so they can say that the statistics align with their viewpoint. This study here is a pretty good demonstration of why these studies can end up being very bad reflections of the truth https://t.co/aSMyW
RT @EmilBergholtz: Basically they conclude that the RCT evidence is comparable to that of using parachutes when jumping from aircrafts. ht…
Basically they conclude that the RCT evidence is comparable to that of using parachutes when jumping from aircrafts. https://t.co/74oNSLYNyZ
@goawaycrackhead @neontaster @zeynep Neither do parachutes 😉 https://t.co/r9489byp5e
A great paper. "Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention." https://t.co/UTCVAvMBbd
@Willeth Here you go, give it a close read.. https://t.co/I16vQ5t3RK
Then again, it's important to remember that parachutes don't work https://t.co/DmGFKi4k9d
@mgpolitis Oops too fast, sorry. Thought you were quoting this one: https://t.co/HRcGWTjeir
@mattindctweets @sarahRbakerDPH @raittioe @RatilalLalloo @AmJEpi @LuisaBorrell @drankursingh99 @CommDentOralEpi They are not, and it always came to my mind the funny trial about parachute to prevent death. Still, some naive people believe RCT are a "magic
an external validity Christmas 2018 @bmj_latest to share with any research methods class: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/AbPBMboPI8 blog version: https://t.co/pWelct5M
@TRyanGregory I'm pretty sure if they did, they'd find out they only calm people and have no effect. There is also a study that proves parachutes do not reduce or prevent major injuries or death when jumping from an aeroplane. Parashute can make one feel s
Read the full study: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/ekje4485AE
RT @Jenesuispasgoth: @alexandra_gros Tu as vu le papier qui démontre que le parachute n'est pas significativement meilleur que pas de parac…
@spinesurgeon https://t.co/bxaEg8pw2J For parachutes there's an RCT sir..!!🤣
@TommyBombadill0 @AliceFromQueens Is there a single RCT to demonstrate that parachutes work? Would you rather have one or not if jumping from a plane? This trial found no effect FWIW. https://t.co/AutsFq6yRu
@AliceFromQueens This should be common sense, masks (basic filtration) don't magically stop working when the mask is worn outside of a hospital or workplace setting where it's ordinarily worn. See also this trial to see whether parachutes prevent deaths: h
RT @Jenesuispasgoth: @alexandra_gros Tu as vu le papier qui démontre que le parachute n'est pas significativement meilleur que pas de parac…
RT @Jenesuispasgoth: @alexandra_gros Tu as vu le papier qui démontre que le parachute n'est pas significativement meilleur que pas de parac…
RT @Jenesuispasgoth: @alexandra_gros Tu as vu le papier qui démontre que le parachute n'est pas significativement meilleur que pas de parac…
@alexandra_gros Tu as vu le papier qui démontre que le parachute n'est pas significativement meilleur que pas de parachute quand on saute d'un avion ? 😁 https://t.co/iNswAcbwBB
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
@leandrotessler Excelente fio, Leandro! Tem tb esse estudo satírico sobre um RCT para testar o uso de paraquedas para prevenir mortes ao pular de um avião: https://t.co/xqlAMIMamX
@leandrotessler https://t.co/UI7tBTlL1I Taí o artigo!
Thinking about the RCT that found no evidence that parachutes work. Serious point that just because an RCT cannot demonstrate benefit, it doesn't mean that benefit doesn't exist. How you do the trial to see if something "works" matters. https://t.co/aEVI
RT @fulcreo: @SClampet @citlanx @jvipondmd RCT of parachutes; jumping out of a stationary airplane (60 cm jump)... "𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙣𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙙…
RT @fulcreo: @SClampet @citlanx @jvipondmd RCT of parachutes; jumping out of a stationary airplane (60 cm jump)... "𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙣𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙙…
RT @fulcreo: @SClampet @citlanx @jvipondmd RCT of parachutes; jumping out of a stationary airplane (60 cm jump)... "𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙣𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙙…
RT @fulcreo: @SClampet @citlanx @jvipondmd RCT of parachutes; jumping out of a stationary airplane (60 cm jump)... "𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙣𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙙…
RT @fulcreo: @SClampet @citlanx @jvipondmd RCT of parachutes; jumping out of a stationary airplane (60 cm jump)... "𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙣𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙙…
@SClampet @citlanx @jvipondmd RCT of parachutes; jumping out of a stationary airplane (60 cm jump)... "𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙣𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙩𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚, 𝙁𝙪𝙡𝙡 𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙥!" https://t.co/hctYFS8CHI
@startledpiskey @MatthewWielicki @ejwwest @UCSanDiego Yellow fingers causes lung cancer as in nicotine stained? 😂 I mean, yes? But also, um. I usually think the points first type my thoughts and google afterwards to grab stats to further reading. My f
@DzjengisC @DeIdealeWereld Soit inderdaad, als U meent dat causatie *alleen* aantoonbaar is door RCT en meta analyse. Daar zijn we het dus duidelijk niet over eens. Om luchtig af te sluiten heb ik hier nog een RCT voor U. Graag gedaan. 👋 https://t.co/t
@DrPletz @another_katt Found one! https://t.co/bKwIAu9Hb2
@nalticx @BarryHunt008 How about a seatbelt human challenge, or no, let's do parachute human challenge study... "we will pay you to jump with only a backpack." Well... the parachute challenge has already been done... 😜 https://t.co/hctYFS8CHI
RT @ewyler: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | The BMJ https://t.co/…
RT @BotanyRNG: I just love this! Next year's @ReadingBioSci part 1 paper review? @reneeleeuk @LouiseJJohnson @BecksSpake @hatbirder Read i…
I just love this! Next year's @ReadingBioSci part 1 paper review? @reneeleeuk @LouiseJJohnson @BecksSpake @hatbirder Read it! 🤣
@serenitynowplze @michaelshermer The RCT problems are well-known, and were discussed multiple times, e.g. in here: https://t.co/gn3VCaJbfX
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @ewyler: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | The BMJ https://t.co/…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @ewyler: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | The BMJ https://t.co/…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
RT @Bepsi9: https://t.co/SzUTYsJUuJ 이거 관련해서 재미있는 논문. 비행기에서 뛰어내릴때 낙하산 착용에 따른 생존률을 RCT로 실험해봤는데 낙하산이 생존률에 영향을 끼치지 못함. 이유는 비행기가 안떠있어서 점프 높이가 0.…
Ahora que empiezo a interesarme por los RCTs, he encontrado esta joya. Más allá de sus implicaciones metodológicas, un buen ejemplo del poder del humor en la ciencia. https://t.co/SjPsQ2qw5V
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
@AlexGodofsky @sgodofsk @besttrousers @RiverTamYDN https://t.co/ey4O9WguKL There is an rct on parachute usage, if you include shitposts
@PeterHotez Someone should ask these reporters why we still use parachutes: https://t.co/Ghddbf1hK3 ;-)
@TheBabelFish1 I don't know if you saw it, but there was an RCT used for parachutes. LOL. https://t.co/I0BmrhSsgI
@MarkDSiegel1 @UrsWeberMD Agreed. Also
I 2018 konkluderede et publiceret RCT-studie at faldskærme ikke reducerer risikoen for traumer eller dødsfald ved spring fra fly. Alle i kontrolgruppen slap fuldstændigt uskadt fra at hoppe ud af et fly med kun en rygsæk på ryggen 👇😇🤭 https://t.co/h7hypwSZ
RT @GFSAR16: @tomaspueyo this one really sends the point home hahaha https://t.co/FeCmpjlbvw
My favourite study for today... https://t.co/xiLk7ipKor
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @c0nc0rdance: The 2018 study is here. My thanks to the authors for such a clear demonstration of an important principle of clinical res…
RT @GFSAR16: @tomaspueyo this one really sends the point home hahaha https://t.co/FeCmpjlbvw