↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Differential Taxes for Differential Risks - Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products.

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
118 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Differential Taxes for Differential Risks - Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products.
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.1056/nejmp1505710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaloupka, Frank J, Sweanor, David, Warner, Kenneth E, Chaloupka, Frank J., Warner, Kenneth E., Frank J. Chaloupka, David Sweanor, Kenneth E. Warner

Abstract

In the face of a rapidly evolving nicotine-product marketplace, policymakers could consider differentially taxing these products to maximize incentives for tobacco users to switch from the most harmful products to the least harmful ones.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Professor 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Social Sciences 5 22%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Psychology 2 9%
Other 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#130,708
of 11,541,953 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,988
of 23,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,870
of 233,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#72
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,541,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.