RT @AlexCLiber: We then propose a Price policy: Create a large economic incentive to use e-cigarettes by greatly raising cigarette taxes wh…
Och här är länken till forskningen: https://t.co/gx8t07IB5x
RT @GregTHR: Borrowed this thought from David Sweanor, who has been writing for a long time about the tremendous pricing power of cigarette…
RT @GregTHR: Borrowed this thought from David Sweanor, who has been writing for a long time about the tremendous pricing power of cigarette…
Borrowed this thought from David Sweanor, who has been writing for a long time about the tremendous pricing power of cigarettes and how to take that into account when regulating less harmful alternatives. https://t.co/sQNGbFajCA
RT @cdoug: @JonathanFoulds @SwitchFinder See Differential Taxes for Differential Risks — Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Product…
@JonathanFoulds @SwitchFinder See Differential Taxes for Differential Risks — Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products, https://t.co/bXq4phdKyO: "In the face of a rapidly evolving nicotine-product marketplace, policymakers could consider differe
RT @vaping4lifer: .@KansansForEplee @realDonaldTrump @JeromeAdamsMD @ScottGottliebMD Makes absolutely no sense to ban a product that gets 7…
RT @vaping4lifer: .@KansansForEplee @realDonaldTrump @JeromeAdamsMD @ScottGottliebMD Makes absolutely no sense to ban a product that gets 7…
.@KansansForEplee @realDonaldTrump @JeromeAdamsMD @ScottGottliebMD Makes absolutely no sense to ban a product that gets 7 million adults off #cigarette that kills 480,000 adult Americans a year #vapingsaveslives #WeVapeWeVote https://t.co/BAAHcbYpIS
RT @Clive_Bates: Economists concerned with public health outcomes would reflect product health risk in the level of taxation (obviously). T…
Economists concerned with public health outcomes would reflect product health risk in the level of taxation (obviously). The World Bank's Bloomberg-funded work conspicuously failed to do this for nicotine products. This approach would be more credible: ht
@UteMons @ZatonskiMateusz @expiatingrobert @robertjwest @daniel_kotz Well, you have probably put your finger on it. The iQOS consumables were significantly cheaper in Japan. In my view, taxation should be risk-proportionate and much lower for smoke-free pr
Thanks for making this very good point. Tax based on risk. As such, tax soda less than cigarettes because soda is less harmful than cigarettes. This is the exact strategy taken by governments that have passed soda taxes. Philadelphia’s is among the largest
#RelativeRisk for #nicotine products. Yes or no? Even more important than boxers or briefs?
@katewbauer @EmilyDhurandhar Regarding tax policy for nicotine products, this paper on risk-based taxation for nicotine products might be interesting to you. Dean Kenneth Warner is the senior author. https://t.co/80wCxO2PTz
@farmormottobak Gärna annat än prat, som fakta och empiri. Har du läst denna? Vad tycker du? https://t.co/oZbFHMRAse
RT @Clive_Bates: There is plenty of theory to back risk-differentiated taxation and none to support it - why ignore this...? Not differenti…
RT @Clive_Bates: There is plenty of theory to back risk-differentiated taxation and none to support it - why ignore this...? Not differenti…
RT @Clive_Bates: There is plenty of theory to back risk-differentiated taxation and none to support it - why ignore this...? Not differenti…
RT @Clive_Bates: There is plenty of theory to back risk-differentiated taxation and none to support it - why ignore this...? Not differenti…
RT @Clive_Bates: There is plenty of theory to back risk-differentiated taxation and none to support it - why ignore this...? Not differenti…
RT @Clive_Bates: There is plenty of theory to back risk-differentiated taxation and none to support it - why ignore this...? Not differenti…
There is plenty of theory to back risk-differentiated taxation and none to support it - why ignore this...? Not differentiating by risk will increase population risk > https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg
RT @JeffaStier: Harm reduction requires taxes in accordance with risk. See https://t.co/Z6g6KJqRzg I agree it should be regulated. But taxe…
Harm reduction requires taxes in accordance with risk. See https://t.co/Z6g6KJqRzg I agree it should be regulated. But taxes can help move people down the risk continuum. https://t.co/l3cdXxjYHy
RT @Clive_Bates: @CRandC @AlexWodak Price *differential* between vaping and smoking is the harm reduction policy. Eg. See > https://t.co/h…
RT @Clive_Bates: @CRandC @AlexWodak Price *differential* between vaping and smoking is the harm reduction policy. Eg. See > https://t.co/h…
@CRandC @AlexWodak Price *differential* between vaping and smoking is the harm reduction policy. Eg. See > https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg
RT @rgougelet: As always, @Tobacconomics et al paper well worth a reread. #CT #vapor https://t.co/Mff1t9fQam https://t.co/IfQxDZPHsm
As always, @Tobacconomics et al paper well worth a reread. #CT #vapor https://t.co/Mff1t9fQam https://t.co/IfQxDZPHsm
@groditi @jamiepastore I like my market-based solutions, but most politicians don't: https://t.co/aJQsV76ueI
Time to try something new! Differential taxation and regulation based on relative risk https://t.co/Mff1t9fQam https://t.co/oM4OgjN53X
@CaeruleanSea @Hifistud @crossbow2112 Results have implications for potential differential tax policy. See https://t.co/2ZQI4MuLlm
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
RT @Clive_Bates: If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https…
If @ACSCANCA was really bothered about saving lives, it would link tobacco tax rates to risk https://t.co/hBsojP2Qcg https://t.co/QEnRb5MHoy
@elsvanhoofcdenv @cdenv @nathaliemuylle Bij voorstellen accijnsverhoging: Differential Taxes for Differential Risks https://t.co/2AwJ1mc2UV
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
RT @GregTHR: .@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #…
.@Tobacconomics @mbuengerMPH Congrats to Dr. Chaloupka, who has called for low or no taxes on #ecigs https://t.co/iK2Fp5Ivq3 #VapingTruth
@HMCollab @NBCNewYork @DrFriedenCDC worth parsing between nicotine products, IMHO. Eg https://t.co/Vdvr57BuGR
@zannymb https://t.co/4IKebFWWiu billions for Über but impossible to raise cap for "real" things. Even lifesaving ones. Don't get it. You?
RT @AVABoard: Also opposing high taxes: Two of the U.S.' most prominent tobacco control economists http://t.co/wZVFmeqbM3 #ecigs https://t.…
RT @AVABoard: Also opposing high taxes: Two of the U.S.' most prominent tobacco control economists http://t.co/wZVFmeqbM3 #ecigs https://t.…
RT @AVABoard: Also opposing high taxes: Two of the U.S.' most prominent tobacco control economists http://t.co/wZVFmeqbM3 #ecigs https://t.…
RT @AVABoard: Also opposing high taxes: Two of the U.S.' most prominent tobacco control economists http://t.co/wZVFmeqbM3 #ecigs https://t.…
RT @AVABoard: Also opposing high taxes: Two of the U.S.' most prominent tobacco control economists http://t.co/wZVFmeqbM3 #ecigs https://t.…
Also opposing high taxes: Two of the U.S.' most prominent tobacco control economists http://t.co/wZVFmeqbM3 #ecigs https://t.co/7Xtjvzmh5Y
Forskare har beskrivit vad som är klok policy för tobak: lägre skatt för mindre skadliga produkter. #snus http://t.co/aiXQeLUBp0
Differential Taxes for Differential Risks — Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products — NEJM http://t.co/BQpDKDp8zz
Differential Taxes for Differential Risks — Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products — NEJM http://t.co/AYePHZUbXI
Differential Taxes for Differential Risks — Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products — NEJM http://t.co/QiZPlYrEvD
RT @NEJM: Should nicotine products be taxed differentially on the basis of degree of risk? http://t.co/DKopzJT0Qi http://t.co/vDcMawMeZH
RT @NEJM: Should nicotine products be taxed differentially on the basis of degree of risk? http://t.co/DKopzJT0Qi http://t.co/vDcMawMeZH
RT @NEJM: Should nicotine products be taxed differentially on the basis of degree of risk? http://t.co/DKopzJT0Qi http://t.co/vDcMawMeZH
Perspective: Differential Taxes for Differential Risks — Toward Reduced Harm from #Nicotine-Yielding Products http://t.co/RTxpuBjyHP
RT @ncdalliance: Differential Taxes for Differential Risks - a means to reduce harm from nicotine-yielding products? #Tobaccocontrol http…
RT @ncdalliance: Differential Taxes for Differential Risks - a means to reduce harm from nicotine-yielding products? #Tobaccocontrol http…
RT @Clive_Bates: Taxing all tobacco and nicotine products in proportion to risk would promote harm reduction - commentary in @NEJM http://t…
RT @ncdalliance: Differential Taxes for Differential Risks - a means to reduce harm from nicotine-yielding products? #Tobaccocontrol http…
Differential Taxes for Differential Risks - a means to reduce harm from nicotine-yielding products? #Tobaccocontrol http://t.co/cbwgQLneg8
RT @Clive_Bates: Taxing all tobacco and nicotine products in proportion to risk would promote harm reduction - commentary in @NEJM http://t…
RT @NEJM: Should nicotine products be taxed differentially on the basis of degree of risk? http://t.co/DKopzJT0Qi http://t.co/vDcMawMeZH
RT @countthedead: Nice work by Frank Chaloupka and friends. Differential Taxes Nicotine-Yielding Products — NEJM http://t.co/blfObcDK53