↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Mentee Missteps

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
675 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Mentee Missteps
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2017
DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.12384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Vaughn, Sanjay Saint, Vineet Chopra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 675 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 20%
Researcher 7 18%
Professor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 53%
Unspecified 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 443. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,824
of 12,389,012 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#458
of 24,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,179
of 333,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#38
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,389,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.