↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

ADAR regulates APOL1 via A-to-I RNA editing by inhibition of MDA5 activation in a paradoxical biological circuit

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
ADAR regulates APOL1 via A-to-I RNA editing by inhibition of MDA5 activation in a paradoxical biological circuit
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2022
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2210150119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristian V. Riella, Michelle McNulty, Guilherme T. Ribas, Calum F. Tattersfield, Chandra Perez-Gill, Felix Eichinger, Jessica Kelly, Justin Chun, Balajikarthick Subramanian, Dieval Guizelini, Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network, Seth L. Alper, Martin R. Pollak, Matthew G. Sampson, David J. Friedman, S Massengill, K Dell, J Sedor, B Martin, K Lemley, S Sharma, T Srivastava, K Markus, C Sethna, S Vento, P Canetta, A Pradhan, L Greenbaum, CS Wang, E Yun, S Adler, J LaPage, M Atkinson, M Williams, E McCarthy, F Fervenza, M Hogan, J Lieske, D Selewski, C Conley, F Kaskel, M Ross, P Flynn, J Kopp, L Malaga-Dieguez, O Zhdanova, B Pace, S Almaani, R Lafayette, S Dave, I Lee, S Quinn-Boyle, S Shah, H Reich, M Hladunewich, P Ling, M Romano, P Brakeman, A Podoll, A Fornoni, C Bidot, M Kretzler, D Gipson, A Williams, C Klida, V Derebail, K Gibson, A Froment, F Ochoa-Toro, L Holzman, K Meyers, K Kallem, A Swenson, K Sharma, K Sambandam, Z Wang, M Rogers, A Jefferson, S Hingorani, K Tuttle, L Manahan, E Pao, K Kuykendall K, JJ Lin, Stefanie Baker, V Dharnidharka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,524,803
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#28,721
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,193
of 434,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#500
of 897 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 897 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.