| Title |
ADAR regulates APOL1 via A-to-I RNA editing by inhibition of MDA5 activation in a paradoxical biological circuit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2210150119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristian V. Riella, Michelle McNulty, Guilherme T. Ribas, Calum F. Tattersfield, Chandra Perez-Gill, Felix Eichinger, Jessica Kelly, Justin Chun, Balajikarthick Subramanian, Dieval Guizelini, Seth L. Alper, Martin R. Pollak, Matthew G. Sampson, David J. Friedman, S Massengill, K Dell, J Sedor, B Martin, K Lemley, S Sharma, T Srivastava, K Markus, C Sethna, S Vento, P Canetta, A Pradhan, L Greenbaum, CS Wang, E Yun, S Adler, J LaPage, M Atkinson, M Williams, E McCarthy, F Fervenza, M Hogan, J Lieske, D Selewski, C Conley, F Kaskel, M Ross, P Flynn, J Kopp, L Malaga-Dieguez, O Zhdanova, B Pace, S Almaani, R Lafayette, S Dave, I Lee, S Quinn-Boyle, S Shah, H Reich, M Hladunewich, P Ling, M Romano, P Brakeman, A Podoll, A Fornoni, C Bidot, M Kretzler, D Gipson, A Williams, C Klida, V Derebail, K Gibson, A Froment, F Ochoa-Toro, L Holzman, K Meyers, K Kallem, A Swenson, K Sharma, K Sambandam, Z Wang, M Rogers, A Jefferson, S Hingorani, K Tuttle, L Manahan, E Pao, K Kuykendall K, JJ Lin, Stefanie Baker, V Dharnidharka |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 52% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,497,311
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#28,534
of 101,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,852
of 432,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#501
of 895 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 895 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.