The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
ADAR regulates APOL1 via A-to-I RNA editing by inhibition of MDA5 activation in a paradoxical biological circuit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2210150119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristian V. Riella, Michelle McNulty, Guilherme T. Ribas, Calum F. Tattersfield, Chandra Perez-Gill, Felix Eichinger, Jessica Kelly, Justin Chun, Balajikarthick Subramanian, Dieval Guizelini, Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network, Seth L. Alper, Martin R. Pollak, Matthew G. Sampson, David J. Friedman, S Massengill, K Dell, J Sedor, B Martin, K Lemley, S Sharma, T Srivastava, K Markus, C Sethna, S Vento, P Canetta, A Pradhan, L Greenbaum, CS Wang, E Yun, S Adler, J LaPage, M Atkinson, M Williams, E McCarthy, F Fervenza, M Hogan, J Lieske, D Selewski, C Conley, F Kaskel, M Ross, P Flynn, J Kopp, L Malaga-Dieguez, O Zhdanova, B Pace, S Almaani, R Lafayette, S Dave, I Lee, S Quinn-Boyle, S Shah, H Reich, M Hladunewich, P Ling, M Romano, P Brakeman, A Podoll, A Fornoni, C Bidot, M Kretzler, D Gipson, A Williams, C Klida, V Derebail, K Gibson, A Froment, F Ochoa-Toro, L Holzman, K Meyers, K Kallem, A Swenson, K Sharma, K Sambandam, Z Wang, M Rogers, A Jefferson, S Hingorani, K Tuttle, L Manahan, E Pao, K Kuykendall K, JJ Lin, Stefanie Baker, V Dharnidharka |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,867,111
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#31,314
of 104,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,627
of 448,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#505
of 898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.