Report for: Global Prevalence of Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

The previous paper from C. Yang et al. cites C. Chen et al. for the 200 million figure, which is the actual origin. https://t.co/38pyE1DFD2 https://t.co/IzLzxIvafD

14 Jun 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

元はこれか。 > Regional prevalence estimates were Asia— 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37,0.65), Europe— 0.44 (95% CI: 0.32,0.56), and North America— 0.31 (95% CI: 0.21,0.43). https://t.co/D205I4P2dQ

24 May 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

@SahabiaAli @Nibor_Tolum Source ? https://t.co/EAB6GWUwZ5 https://t.co/eRg5rpBOPC

19 May 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

@HarvardBiz Compared to other estimates, like an April meta-analysis that puts global long Covid at closer to 50% https://t.co/d3CjvQXF4g or a June household survey from CDC saying 1 in 3, https://t.co/MaA8gYaSIS it’s even on the low side.

10 May 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ygjumi: COVID-19後の状態、または、Long COVIDの世界的有病率：メタ分析とシステマティック・レビュー Global Prevalence of Post COVID-19 Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Anal…

21 Feb 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @EmiNakayama7: @NihaoBaozi333 41本の論文を並べてみると9%から81%とバラついている。その中央値が43% brain fogよりはfatigue倦怠感が多い https://t.co/crChDSRDdm

02 Feb 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

@RainbowFoxyArt @ejustin46 here's the link to that study (peer reviewed journal): https://t.co/ZaScXh5A3J Here is a collection with links to more from Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital: https://t.co/YytdonCgJk

24 Jan 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @kelly_peters: @ObviousElk @a_better_world2 @DoubleYouPowell @drseanmullen @michael_hoerger @sasswashere @waltz_tales At least 200 milli…

13 Jan 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

@ObviousElk @a_better_world2 @DoubleYouPowell @drseanmullen @michael_hoerger @sasswashere @waltz_tales At least 200 million people worldwide have struggled with long COVID. https://t.co/QlbU4eLjqp

13 Jan 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

@ianmSC "Fifty studies were included, and 41 were meta-analyzed. Global estimated pooled prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], .39-.46)." https://t.co/WxTqp6w5RW

22 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @drseanmullen: The Chen et al 2022 study https://t.co/3ur9uqr0d7

07 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

The Chen et al 2022 study https://t.co/3ur9uqr0d7

07 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @EmiNakayama7: @NihaoBaozi333 41本の論文を並べてみると9%から81%とバラついている。その中央値が43% brain fogよりはfatigue倦怠感が多い https://t.co/crChDSRDdm

26 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

@AndreasShrugged @bmj_latest Das ist das Ergebnis dieser Metaanalyse aus dem @JIDJournal, die allerdings nur zeigt wie komplett unsinnig weit Long/PostCovid in >90% aller berücksichtigten Studien definiert wurde. https://t.co/yM3sfiVCmK

23 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

Vi krevde minimum ett symptom - igjen en helt vanlig måte å måle forekomst etter WHO-kriteriene. Se f. eks. denne systematiske oversikten, som bruker samme kriterium https://t.co/ZkRfmLFgLC 4/7 https://t.co/7ERDCY7oTN

17 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

@IzZatRight @scott_squires Compared to other estimates, like an April meta-analysis that puts global long Covid at closer to 50% https://t.co/d3CjvQXF4g or a June household survey from CDC saying 1 in 3, https://t.co/MaA8gYaSIS it’s even on the low si

14 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

Ja viittaus tähän papruun: Chen et al., Global Prevalence of Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 226, Issue 9, 1 November 2022, Pages 1593–1607,

07 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

A really good review of general COVID info, symptoms, prevalence, etc. https://t.co/sF6rEfWZNG

01 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ejustin46: 6) Source : https://t.co/FCCyNyCUcR https://t.co/CZyZXOpT9a

24 Oct 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ejustin46: 6) Source : https://t.co/FCCyNyCUcR https://t.co/CZyZXOpT9a

19 Oct 2023

Reply Repost Favourite