The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Trends in Survival after In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1109148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saket Girotra, Brahmajee K Nallamothu, John A Spertus, Yan Li, Harlan M Krumholz, Paul S Chan |
| Abstract |
Despite advances in resuscitation care in recent years, it is not clear whether survival and neurologic function after in-hospital cardiac arrest have improved over time. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 57% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 522 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 13% |
| Other | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 8% |
| Other | 143 | 26% |
| Unknown | 110 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 322 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 1% |
| Psychology | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 37 | 7% |
| Unknown | 141 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 626. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2024.
All research outputs
#38,167
of 26,605,615 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,375
of 33,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124
of 194,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,605,615 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.