| Title |
Trends in Survival after In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1109148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saket Girotra, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, John A. Spertus, Yan Li, Harlan M. Krumholz, Paul S. Chan |
| Abstract |
Despite advances in resuscitation care in recent years, it is not clear whether survival and neurologic function after in-hospital cardiac arrest have improved over time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 508 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 13% |
| Other | 67 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 8% |
| Other | 140 | 26% |
| Unknown | 103 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 320 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 1% |
| Psychology | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 7% |
| Unknown | 132 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 576. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#38,943
of 24,752,377 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,424
of 32,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131
of 183,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,752,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.