| Title |
Haplotype-resolved diverse human genomes and integrated analysis of structural variation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abf7117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Ebert, Peter A Audano, Qihui Zhu, Bernardo Rodriguez-Martin, David Porubsky, Marc Jan Bonder, Arvis Sulovari, Jana Ebler, Weichen Zhou, Rebecca Serra Mari, Feyza Yilmaz, Xuefang Zhao, PingHsun Hsieh, Joyce Lee, Sushant Kumar, Jiadong Lin, Tobias Rausch, Yu Chen, Jingwen Ren, Martin Santamarina, Wolfram Höps, Hufsah Ashraf, Nelson T Chuang, Xiaofei Yang, Katherine M Munson, Alexandra P Lewis, Susan Fairley, Luke J Tallon, Wayne E Clarke, Anna O Basile, Marta Byrska-Bishop, André Corvelo, Uday S Evani, Tsung-Yu Lu, Mark J P Chaisson, Junjie Chen, Chong Li, Harrison Brand, Aaron M Wenger, Maryam Ghareghani, William T Harvey, Benjamin Raeder, Patrick Hasenfeld, Allison A Regier, Haley J Abel, Ira M Hall, Paul Flicek, Oliver Stegle, Mark B Gerstein, Jose M C Tubio, Zepeng Mu, Yang I Li, Xinghua Shi, Alex R Hastie, Kai Ye, Zechen Chong, Ashley D Sanders, Michael C Zody, Michael E Talkowski, Ryan E Mills, Scott E Devine, Charles Lee, Jan O Korbel, Tobias Marschall, Evan E Eichler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 504 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 100 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 6% |
| Spain | 26 | 5% |
| Germany | 22 | 4% |
| Japan | 16 | 3% |
| France | 12 | 2% |
| Australia | 11 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% |
| Canada | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 65 | 13% |
| Unknown | 207 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 263 | 52% |
| Scientists | 231 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 479 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 479 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 93 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 14% |
| Unknown | 157 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 144 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Unknown | 171 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 605. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#38,244
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,592
of 83,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,497
of 454,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#57
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.