↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

An Empirical Antigen Selection Method Identifies Neoantigens That Either Elicit Broad Antitumor T-cell Responses or Drive Tumor Growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
twitter
21 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
An Empirical Antigen Selection Method Identifies Neoantigens That Either Elicit Broad Antitumor T-cell Responses or Drive Tumor Growth
Published in
Cancer Discovery, January 2021
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0377
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hubert Lam, Lisa K. McNeil, Hanna Starobinets, Victoria L. DeVault, Roger B. Cohen, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Melissa L. Johnson, Maura L. Gillison, Mark N. Stein, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Arthur P. DeCillis, James J. Foti, Vijetha Vemulapalli, Emily Tjon, Kyle Ferber, Daniel B. DeOliveira, Wendy Broom, Parul Agnihotri, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, Kwok-Kin Wong, Charles G. Drake, Pamela M. Carroll, Thomas A. Davis, Jessica Baker Flechtner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 35%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#192,854
of 17,489,191 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#66
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,439
of 327,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#11
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,489,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.