| Title |
Childhood self-control forecasts the pace of midlife aging and preparedness for old age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2010211118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah S. Richmond-Rakerd, Avshalom Caspi, Antony Ambler, Tracy d’Arbeloff, Marieke de Bruine, Maxwell Elliott, HonaLee Harrington, Sean Hogan, Renate M. Houts, David Ireland, Ross Keenan, Annchen R. Knodt, Tracy R. Melzer, Sena Park, Richie Poulton, Sandhya Ramrakha, Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen, Elizabeth Sack, Adam T. Schmidt, Maria L. Sison, Jasmin Wertz, Ahmad R. Hariri, Terrie E. Moffitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 22% |
| Spain | 9 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| Japan | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 66 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 64% |
| Scientists | 32 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 54 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 481. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#56,189
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,430
of 103,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,784
of 530,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#41
of 1,014 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,014 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.