RT @robymuhamad: Lebih banyak orang yg mencari pembenaran, bukan kebenaran. Implikasinya, informasi yg seliweran di medsos cenderung tidak…
RT @Cult_Archaeo: And finally, to learn about how retractions may not impact the initial disinformation that has spread and suggestions on…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @Cult_Archaeo: And finally, to learn about how retractions may not impact the initial disinformation that has spread and suggestions on…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @Cult_Archaeo: And finally, to learn about how retractions may not impact the initial disinformation that has spread and suggestions on…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
RT @FlintDibble: Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the…
Instead, these retractions and media fall into the same trap that @Cult_Archaeo is tweeting about By simply repeating the incorrect details of a retracted article and not even bothering to provide accurate information, the record is not corrected https:/
RT @Cult_Archaeo: And finally, to learn about how retractions may not impact the initial disinformation that has spread and suggestions on…
RT @Cult_Archaeo: And finally, to learn about how retractions may not impact the initial disinformation that has spread and suggestions on…
RT @Cult_Archaeo: And finally, to learn about how retractions may not impact the initial disinformation that has spread and suggestions on…
RT @Cult_Archaeo: And finally, to learn about how retractions may not impact the initial disinformation that has spread and suggestions on…
@Silvereagle214 I suggest you read this https://t.co/7G0mmSvp1C
agak problem di definisi misinformasi sih. karena penulis jurnal gak membedakan misinformasi dan disinformasi?
RT @robymuhamad: Lebih banyak orang yg mencari pembenaran, bukan kebenaran. Implikasinya, informasi yg seliweran di medsos cenderung tidak…
Lebih banyak orang yg mencari pembenaran, bukan kebenaran. Implikasinya, informasi yg seliweran di medsos cenderung tidak mengubah opini/preferensi, tapi memperkuat yg sudah ada https://t.co/vdGm0tCdVB
@AlpacaAurelius The information is out there if you know where to look and stop listening to debunked nonsense. https://t.co/Et1TBnF1T7
@Yunny1XD https://t.co/IGC6XNw9vR this is about antivaxxers for example but we all know that one pseudoscience leads into another because they fit together fundamentally because of people's warped perception of reality and their ideology
RT @SallySueIam: @RichardGrenell @jonkarl It’s unfortunate that our culture, and our media, sometimes give celebrities a chance to comment…
@RichardGrenell @jonkarl It’s unfortunate that our culture, and our media, sometimes give celebrities a chance to comment without opposition on subjects about which they are often misinformed. https://t.co/3PbkXZjnoI
Conspiracy theories are persuasive, often playing on people’s feelings and sense of identity. Even if debunking conspiracy theories was effective, it’s difficult to keep up with how quickly they appear and how widespread they travel. https://t.co/VrHkzm8
RT @MyUKnumber4: @CJWorld9 @davidkersten There's quite a few studies, I think. This one is good ~ trying to correct it can make it worse! h…
He is taking advantage of the Backfire effect, knowing that even if his claims are responded with facts this will only push people further into his ideology https://t.co/uNbB1guQNP
@NickAdamsinUSA @Todd78175916 Thats funny because this study shows that someone who watches Fox News is less informed than someone who doesn't w latch any news. https://t.co/8GLFOy51jL
RT @villagerssn: Another article about, this one about *debiasing* Who decides what is misinformation? "Misinformation and Its Correction…
Another article about, this one about *debiasing* Who decides what is misinformation? "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" https://t.co/vK1ru5VSHm
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/QPBCLCdsJu
@CJWorld9 @davidkersten There's quite a few studies, I think. This one is good ~ trying to correct it can make it worse! https://t.co/BW022IaHjx
@segueopercurso @stacey_bluer1 @Jo_smx If you're interested in the topic of misinformation and haven't read it already, I found this research paper to be very interesting https://t.co/NCAZulVOws
RT @lloyd_frombriz: @NovelSci The cognitive science subdiscipline of heuristics has a lot to say on this. https://t.co/ooJbKZB6wp
RT @lloyd_frombriz: @NovelSci The cognitive science subdiscipline of heuristics has a lot to say on this. https://t.co/ooJbKZB6wp
@NovelSci The cognitive science subdiscipline of heuristics has a lot to say on this. https://t.co/ooJbKZB6wp
Elizabeth utilise cet article de @STWorg (et ses amis) pour expliquer comment la tentative de correction des erreurs peut se retourner contre vous. https://t.co/mAv7xSPo1H
Elizabeth uses this article from @STWorg (and friends) to help explain how the attempt to correct misinformation can backfire. https://t.co/mAv7xSPo1H
some research on the question -why do people believe obvious nonsense? https://t.co/QTVTjUEIjj https://t.co/eyNkA8olJp
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing @STWorg (Lewandowsky et al. 2012) https://t.co/pgyORGncKh
Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook https://t.co/NyRkmEsKRK
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JlibDoesEcon @DGoncalvesDS @Jack_J_Willis Super-interested to read but honest question - you know there's a huge psych l…
@Florin_Uncovers @KleinWanderer @STWorg He appears to be one of those so convinced of the rightness of his position, that it is ok to use behavioral techniques to convince others without their knowledge or consent. I find these people dangerous. https://t
@STWorg @past_is_future @stuartjdneil @Karen_Douglas @JoeUscinski @Sander_vdLinden @UlliEcker @johnfocook @adamhfinn @jitsuvax @CorneliaBetsch It appears to me that you are using the techniques you have learned to nudge people into what you thing is the ri
RT @SciComm_ES: 📄 Y finalmente en la publicación en @SAGEJournals de Stephan Lewandowsky et al (2012) se incluye esta imagen donde vemos re…
RT @Sonicando: 👇
👇
📄 Y finalmente en la publicación en @SAGEJournals de Stephan Lewandowsky et al (2012) se incluye esta imagen donde vemos representadas algunas soluciones prácticas para los problemas de desinformación más comunes https://t.co/jYuZE3Tvrr https://t.co/gsZGX3
Link del paper de (Lewandowsky et al., 2012) "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" https://t.co/jDIt8QQzra
@George_Bliadze @STWorg Second to last sentence in this paragraph, and open access to the article here: https://t.co/xqm7VqIwPB https://t.co/IWsKWCNh5E
RT @MarkHoofnagle: @gorskon @AviBittMD @drbrignall @kevinnbass I would chose as an example of how to do it right, the lit from Cook and Lew…
@JlibDoesEcon @DGoncalvesDS @Jack_J_Willis Super-interested to read but honest question - you know there's a huge psych literature on the continued influence effect, right? @UlliEcker @STWorg and many others can tell you more. don't see any of it here. one
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/XerYE1o3he
RT @ScienceIsTruth: #ScienceInfo Vaccine myths are a real problem. We waste research money on them, we refuse COVID-29 vaccines because of…
#ScienceInfo Vaccine myths are a real problem. We waste research money on them, we refuse COVID-29 vaccines because of them and parents withhold immunization because of them. Result: People die. How do you fight back and be HEARD? It can be done. https://t
RT @MrSocial: Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, C…
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/vwFrAb6Aph
@carolyneholmes @DrorWalter @YVeilleuxLepage Best review to date of continued effect of misinformation remains Lewandowsky et al 2012: https://t.co/WeX9ReHN4Y
RT @Doubting_Tom: Conspiracy theories are like memetic viruses, designed to propagate easily while doing harm to their hosts. And misinform…
RT @hen_drik: If you're interested in the study of #disinformation, I highly recommend this thorough paper on "#Misinformation and Its Corr…
If you're interested in the study of #disinformation, I highly recommend this thorough paper on "#Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" by @STWorg et al. https://t.co/EJDA8xKSZ6 https://t.co/K7kydriL5M
Research has shown that corrections post #FactCheck are unable to undo the damage done. The “continued influence effect” phenomenon shows that “post-exposure” is unable to reach the same number of people as the original #misinformation https://t.co/rUfjL
@stephanevw De artigo, este aqui - apesar de precisar de alguma atualização - é bom tb: https://t.co/USQiJqKZHX
Source (2012): https://t.co/ZUGFBeSQRb
Because it‘s the day after Jan 6 2020 Quoting from a 2012 research on debiasing vs. misinformation. Surely worth reading - today more than ever https://t.co/k7KdkrycEJ https://t.co/1Xd0JpZ22r
@konkret24 @tvn24 @GabaSieczkowska @Jan_Kunert * grafika zapożyczona z https://t.co/sqVCzZzoLY Polecam całość
You can find the paper here and I would recommend reading it, especially if you have victims of misinfo in your life or if you would like to improve how you think about your own beliefs. 🤗 (end) https://t.co/BiP9QXqbzZ
@H_Sjastad A great resource on this topic. https://t.co/QM81XNoaLu
Sources : [1] : https://t.co/sFrPPGFrtJ [2] : https://t.co/Jp6cLhPknI [3] : https://t.co/NSn8MOI7Jj [4] : https://t.co/QQnT2tDKyv [5] : https://t.co/8LEyti3xYA Fin du fil, merci pour la lecture si vous en êtes arrivés là 🙏
Older but still a good overview -> Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/HZO9S4oHCk
Und auch diese Textbox ist noch eingebunden. Befürchte nur, dass so pauschale Debunking-Methoden nichts bringen. Empfehle dazu sehr dieses Paper von @STWorg: https://t.co/4r50gwavXJ https://t.co/Gd9BzHuhkH
This article which has some misinformation but useful anyways. It's the best thing I have, also discusses points well, and interesting references. https://t.co/sYrYjiGmZ7
Yes! The best way to stop the influence of misinformation, rather than fighting it be correction, IS preventing it from being seen... https://t.co/6vy2ZRXjgd
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @hrheingold: Toward a design of debunking
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @hrheingold: Toward a design of debunking https://t.co/flqmgPQjJo
RT @hrheingold: Toward a design of debunking
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @sarahsmaga: A8: Talk about the importance of this election with everyone you know. And as scientists, I know it's tempting to jump on e…
A8: Talk about the importance of this election with everyone you know. And as scientists, I know it's tempting to jump on every single inaccurate statement. But if you're going to fight misinformation, follow the social science! #ScienceRising https://t.co