RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @ImogenRCoePhD: Here is a gr8t resource fr brilliant @LizNeeley to help with HOW to address #misinformation etc. @LiisaGalea @StanKutche…
RT @ImogenRCoePhD: Here is a gr8t resource fr brilliant @LizNeeley to help with HOW to address #misinformation etc. @LiisaGalea @StanKutche…
Here is a gr8t resource fr brilliant @LizNeeley to help with HOW to address #misinformation etc. @LiisaGalea @StanKutcher @SciXchangeRU @KrishanaSankar @DrJenGunter @CaulfieldTim @CSMB_SCBM @vickyyyf @erinjprosser
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
very good psychology article on combatting misinformation/myth, on-line or otherwise, with this handy-dandy chart! thanks to @rachelnabors for sharing this. https://t.co/n2vjwAkp6B /cc @TWIScience @drkiki @blairsmenagerie @SHOUTYBLAIR @Jacksonfly
To fight #misinformation, use "repeated, simple rebuttals that emphasize correct information." Frame your rebuttal to endorse the community's values and affirm identity.
A handy chart if you write documentation for popular JavaScript libraries
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @mackenwells: Read the whole thread, and the article at the top - Liz is an absolute sci-com leader "We are all science communicators no…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
Read the whole thread, and the article at the top - Liz is an absolute sci-com leader "We are all science communicators now: COVID19 has conscripted us."
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall, https://t.co/T6r1R44WAZ) Solution is repeated, simple rebuttals that emphasize the correct information, framed to affirm worldview/
RT SAGEpsychology Seeing conflicting stories on your newsfeeds about COVID-19? Here's how we can combat #misinformation and correct it https://t.co/EAAfytIpHf
Seeing conflicting stories on your newsfeeds about COVID-19? Here's how we can combat #misinformation and correct it https://t.co/ZgCuR1pPkx
RT @UPDPsych: A comprehensive take on how fake news spreads and influences people — and how to help people defend against it https://t.co/H…
RT @UPDPsych: A comprehensive take on how fake news spreads and influences people — and how to help people defend against it https://t.co/H…
RT @UPDPsych: A comprehensive take on how fake news spreads and influences people — and how to help people defend against it https://t.co/H…
RT @UPDPsych: A comprehensive take on how fake news spreads and influences people — and how to help people defend against it https://t.co/H…
A comprehensive take on how fake news spreads and influences people — and how to help people defend against it https://t.co/HFWF7iziuV
RT @M_B_Petersen: @SSTSundhed Tip om misinformation til jer og @TjekDet. Det er vigtigt ikke at inkludere grafikken i tweet og artikel, da…
RT @M_B_Petersen: @SSTSundhed Tip om misinformation til jer og @TjekDet. Det er vigtigt ikke at inkludere grafikken i tweet og artikel, da…
@KnudsenLisbeth @SSTSundhed @TjekDet Hej Lisbeth. Overvej at sæt artiklen op, så grafikken (=misinformationen) ikke kommer med som automatisk thumbnail, når historien deles: https://t.co/ihRNKXLWlk
@SSTSundhed Tip om misinformation til jer og @TjekDet. Det er vigtigt ikke at inkludere grafikken i tweet og artikel, da folk lagrer indholdet af og korrektheden af information forskelligt (https://t.co/0zSxqlWt75.) Så de husker måske grafikken, men glemme
Here is a good review for @AusSMC and @JN_Institute https://t.co/6DURWFwg9H
@SandraDunn1955 @ajhanlaurence Access and download the full pdf here: https://t.co/CubKnoFBSi
@SandraDunn1955 @ajhanlaurence How to combat Brexsh*t Pt. 2 https://t.co/VTB1RddfQz
@inselratte Access and download the full pdf here: https://t.co/CubKnoFBSi
@inselratte How to combat Brexsh*t Pt. 2 https://t.co/VTB1RddfQz
RT @rskudesia: How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research 💪 (link: https://t.co/A4ltaSmcNT; via @alfiebudj) https://…
@H_Sjastad I am pretty sure that this paper mentions fluency as one of the factors, though it might not be what you were looking for. "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" by Lewandowsky et al., 2012 https://t.c
@r_heisman @FancyScientist @ThisIsSethsBlog @PatFlynn do you know @jonhaidt's work? https://t.co/lzeXISlias These are also excellent, though not books https://t.co/pcSgOsgHdv & https://t.co/MRsa2R95FN & https://t.co/zO2kkLYu52
A propósito del planteo de ayer sobre cadenas de desinformaciones en #Plottier aporto el artículo de dos investigadores que se preguntan, cómo se originan las desinformaciones y por qué son tan difíciles de combatir: https://t.co/7GQ8lah7Mm
Dan wajar aja kalo kampanye misinformasi bermodal hashtag lebih populer untuk dipakai meredam kepanikan massa daripada pendekatan yang lebih berakal https://t.co/aTuOTEixZv
RT @fineeyes: @ProfDaveAndress @HallieRubenhold Trying to debunk commonly held beliefs can also cause the "backfire effect," further entren…
@ProfDaveAndress @HallieRubenhold Trying to debunk commonly held beliefs can also cause the "backfire effect," further entrenching the false information 😕 https://t.co/EaZ5P0XBtt
@canete707 @Lvadler Este artículo contiene algunas pistas sobre cómo enfrentarse a quien se resiste a dejar de estar mal informado, más ninguna es la panacea. https://t.co/fT1EsBwuDw
RT @rskudesia: How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research 💪 (link: https://t.co/A4ltaSmcNT; via @alfiebudj) https://…
RT @rskudesia: How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research 💪 (link: https://t.co/A4ltaSmcNT; via @alfiebudj) https://…
RT @rskudesia: How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research 💪 (link: https://t.co/A4ltaSmcNT; via @alfiebudj) https://…
How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research 💪 (link: https://t.co/A4ltaSmcNT; via @alfiebudj) https://t.co/9kj5To7AoM
@lpolovets 1. nothing about flag making people click more! 2. sentence links to this paper from 2012 conducted by academic researchers with no affiliation from facebook! https://t.co/X9AzYN1Nqn
@raquelrecuero @tarushijio @ronaldfar @followlori @cardososampaio @grohmann_rafael @RicardoMPimenta De psicologia tem um ótimo, bem antigo (Lewandoski et al 2012), sobre meios de desgrudar o fake das pessoas: https://t.co/4jzWNEXubk
@adamgdunn The evidence does sort of support this. Repetition is effective in persuasion in many domains. https://t.co/BPl2QxGFun. But we don’t yet know whether repetition works for vax info, especially given how poorly persuasion works in this context. ht
@TAscendedSaiyan Good question! I believe the end of https://t.co/Tx1uNzIh8R explores this, and in 2014, people noticed and wrote more easily digestible guides... Give me a sec...
RT @MedicinArt: Formas simples de combatir la #desinformacion en #ciencia y #salud #NASColloquia by @theNASEM Médicos y científicos deberí…
RT @MedicinArt: Formas simples de combatir la #desinformacion en #ciencia y #salud #NASColloquia by @theNASEM Médicos y científicos deberí…
RT @MedicinArt: Formas simples de combatir la #desinformacion en #ciencia y #salud #NASColloquia by @theNASEM Médicos y científicos deberí…
RT @MedicinArt: Formas simples de combatir la #desinformacion en #ciencia y #salud #NASColloquia by @theNASEM Médicos y científicos deberí…
RT @MedicinArt: Formas simples de combatir la #desinformacion en #ciencia y #salud #NASColloquia by @theNASEM Médicos y científicos deberí…
RT @SunshineMenezes: Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myt…
Formas simples de combatir la #desinformacion en #ciencia y #salud #NASColloquia by @theNASEM Médicos y científicos deberían recibir mejor entrenamiento en mercadeo y comunicación @ASCOFAME_ @aca_ciencia @Mineducacion @elespectador @SemanaEd
RT @SunshineMenezes: Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myt…
RT @SunshineMenezes: Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myt…
RT @SunshineMenezes: Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myt…
RT @SunshineMenezes: Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myt…
RT @SunshineMenezes: Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myt…
RT @SunshineMenezes: Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myt…
Useful info for correcting misperceptions from Lewandowsky et al. The summary: 1) emphasize facts, avoid repeating myths; 2) deliver simple, brief rebuttals; 3) package rebuttals in ways that affirm audience worldview & identity #nascolloquia #scicomm
@MarcusT313 @drvox Science communication works. https://t.co/yQdMNffuK2
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/FobV91XtEa
RT @luizacaires3: Informação importante pro povo da divulgação. Concordo em gênero número e grau com a @alinemghilardi. E @BlogsUnicamp dan…
RT @alinemghilardi: @BlogsUnicamp A estratégia utilizada para chamar a atenção, chocar/indignar o público e depois refutar têm efeitos muit…
Informação importante pro povo da divulgação. Concordo em gênero número e grau com a @alinemghilardi. E @BlogsUnicamp dando show de como deve ser a postura diante de uma crítica. Estamos todos aprendendo e construindo.
RT @alinemghilardi: @BlogsUnicamp A estratégia utilizada para chamar a atenção, chocar/indignar o público e depois refutar têm efeitos muit…
RT @alinemghilardi: @BlogsUnicamp A estratégia utilizada para chamar a atenção, chocar/indignar o público e depois refutar têm efeitos muit…
@BlogsUnicamp A estratégia utilizada para chamar a atenção, chocar/indignar o público e depois refutar têm efeitos muito mais negativos do que positivos e isso têm sido comprovado até mesmo por pesquisas na área de divulgação. https://t.co/lpnllrlOSh
RT @VirpiKalakoski: @mputtone @KKetolaAnnala @rubenstiller @katrisaarikivi @NinaSajaniemi #Valetieto'a on vaikea kitkeä, mutta miksi? Laaj…
RT @VirpiKalakoski: @mputtone @KKetolaAnnala @rubenstiller @katrisaarikivi @NinaSajaniemi #Valetieto'a on vaikea kitkeä, mutta miksi? Laaj…
RT @VirpiKalakoski: @mputtone @KKetolaAnnala @rubenstiller @katrisaarikivi @NinaSajaniemi #Valetieto'a on vaikea kitkeä, mutta miksi? Laaj…
RT @VirpiKalakoski: @mputtone @KKetolaAnnala @rubenstiller @katrisaarikivi @NinaSajaniemi #Valetieto'a on vaikea kitkeä, mutta miksi? Laaj…
@mputtone @KKetolaAnnala @rubenstiller @katrisaarikivi @NinaSajaniemi #Valetieto'a on vaikea kitkeä, mutta miksi? Laaja tutkimuskatsaus auttaa ymmärtämään ihmislajille tyypillisiä rajoituksia ja ajatteluvirheitä. #kognitiivinen #psykologia #avointiede @t
Justo ayer me llegó por WhatsApp esa cadena en un grupo de profesores 🤦♂️. Dejo varias fuentes sobre bulos y sobre los que no leen y hacen forward... https://t.co/EgHoCKFjvY https://t.co/mpHqA8fjBB https://t.co/s30ARcJHwJ https://t.co/yucxpKjLPI htt
@Jacobvanetten @Godwin_UQ @AgroBioDiverse @nature @Greenpeace @FoEint @domglov For many years I thought this was all about facts. It isn't. Science education is no match for emotional fear mongering. I've found these far more relevant than Glover https://t
@JessicaCalarco @AnnaRopp @BrendanNyhan @asociologist Reference? I believe repeating the false statement is a mistake. See https://t.co/qWdmxDIVnW
@bakermind @JennyRohn @guardiansciblog Yes the 'backfire effect' is real, but its not inevitable. I haven't seen much work on this but this paper by @STWorg and colleagues notes how different strategies might actually reduce bias, including the backfire ef
@drg1985 https://t.co/rW0CdZdC0E https://t.co/gnvBSPxFrF https://t.co/njqxCEZD5s (not peer-reviewed, but good references)
@Leftsucks2 @haj4457 @realDonaldTrump I sourced a peer-reviewed medical journal. https://t.co/f56drOSVCv
@Leftsucks2 @haj4457 @realDonaldTrump Actually, it’s peer-reviewed science. If you bothered to read past a headline you’d have known that. https://t.co/f56drOSVCv
@Jordiew @brianstelter @Amy_Siskind @GeorgeLakoff @ReliableSources Recent article directly speaking about Trump: https://t.co/QKMMo9JV8z Link to article which also links to cognitive research on misinformation and the brain: https://t.co/JNwWPDS4or
How can misinformation and #pseudoscience, such as the false belief that there is a link between vaccinations and autism, be successful? Very detailed analysis and recommendations for the debunking of misinformation. https://t.co/QxlgP8PGtU
@jjgrazer Maybe this is it: "Misinformation and Its Correction Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" by Lewandowsky et al, 2012: https://t.co/BV4wwuEBv8
@EnteBaer @christinaph84 @crazycurlydoc @SiSadness @Landurologe Im Allgemeinen zeigt sich das beim sogenannten "Backfire Effect". Zudem ist dies insbesondere bei Impfungen Gegenstand der Forschung: https://t.co/IJFd8jUvaW
This suggestion is really great: "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" - would love a version of this that accounts for the last few years of additional research and events (this is from 2012); link: https://t.c
Just came across this nice summary on how to correct misinformation. See the full article here https://t.co/6feqQU5KmL #bias #AlternativeFacts #FakeNews #Science https://t.co/H358gQ5gAn
@mindyjiang If you read the research literature -- beyond the high-level coverage in the article -- on the backfire effect, it's rarer for this to happen. See the metareview at Lewandowsky 2012 https://t.co/DCUIxlvszp
There's evidence on this - correcting misinformation often unsuccessful, promotes the original misinformation https://t.co/EFH9nlFSK8
Misinformation and Its Correction – Psychological Science in the Public Interest https://t.co/lRCXqz6IKN