The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
“You” speaks to me: Effects of generic-you in creating resonance between people and ideas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2010939117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ariana Orvell, Ethan Kross, Susan A. Gelman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 78% |
| Scientists | 24 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#181,794
of 26,781,404 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,468
of 105,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,019
of 534,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#84
of 1,016 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,781,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,016 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.