| Title |
Assessment of Rates of Suicide Risk Screening and Prevalence of Positive Screening Results Among US Veterans After Implementation of the Veterans Affairs Suicide Risk Identification Strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22531 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nazanin Bahraini, Lisa A. Brenner, Catherine Barry, Trisha Hostetter, Janelle Keusch, Edward P. Post, Chad Kessler, Cliff Smith, Bridget B. Matarazzo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 48% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 45% |
| Scientists | 14 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,012,513
of 25,249,294 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#4,271
of 9,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,068
of 427,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#170
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,249,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.