↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Direct kinetic fingerprinting and digital counting of single protein molecules

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Direct kinetic fingerprinting and digital counting of single protein molecules
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2008312117
Authors

Tanmay Chatterjee, Achim Knappik, Erin Sandford, Muneesh Tewari, Sung Won Choi, William B. Strong, Evan P. Thrush, Kenneth J. Oh, Ning Liu, Nils G. Walter, Alexander Johnson-Buck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 32%
Researcher 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 22%
Engineering 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Chemistry 4 10%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,691,564
of 18,800,073 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#53,870
of 91,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,145
of 309,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#882
of 1,109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,800,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.