| Title |
Direct kinetic fingerprinting and digital counting of single protein molecules
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2008312117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanmay Chatterjee, Achim Knappik, Erin Sandford, Muneesh Tewari, Sung Won Choi, William B Strong, Evan P Thrush, Kenneth J Oh, Ning Liu, Nils G Walter, Alexander Johnson-Buck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 32% |
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 25% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,640,360
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#44,073
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,935
of 404,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#759
of 1,064 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,064 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.