Title |
Evaluation of Vasopressor Exposure and Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004476 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Russel J Roberts, Todd A Miano, Drayton A Hammond, Gourang P Patel, Jen-Ting Chen, Kristy M Phillips, Natasha Lopez, Kianoush Kashani, Nida Qadir, Charles B Cairns, Kusum Mathews, Pauline Park, Akram Khan, James F Gilmore, Anne Rain Tanner Brown, Betty Tsuei, Michele Handzel, Alfredo Lee Chang, Abhijit Duggal, Michael Lanspa, James Taylor Herbert, Anthony Martinez, Joseph Tonna, Mahmoud A Ammar, Lama H Nazer, Mojdeh Heavner, Erin Pender, Lauren Chambers, Michael T Kenes, David Kaufman, April Downey, Brent Brown, Darlene Chaykosky, Armand Wolff, Michael Smith, Katie Nault, Michelle N Gong, Jonathan E Sevransky, Ishaq Lat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 31% |
India | 2 | 4% |
Chile | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 23% |
Scientists | 7 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 14 | 19% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 44% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,182,534
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#666
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,140
of 413,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#21
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.