The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Predictors of Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circoutcomes.109.889576 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Comilla Sasson, Mary A.M. Rogers, Jason Dahl, Arthur L. Kellermann |
| Abstract |
Prior studies have identified key predictors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but differences exist in the magnitude of these findings. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the strength of associations between OHCA and key factors (event witnessed by a bystander or emergency medical services [EMS], provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], initial cardiac rhythm, or the return of spontaneous circulation). We also examined trends in OHCA survival over time. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 942 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 927 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 136 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 125 | 13% |
| Researcher | 91 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 87 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 73 | 8% |
| Other | 224 | 24% |
| Unknown | 206 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 495 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Engineering | 16 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 1% |
| Other | 91 | 10% |
| Unknown | 235 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 543. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#46,851
of 26,108,988 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#18
of 1,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63
of 109,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,108,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.