↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Predictors of Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,770)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1740 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
933 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Published in
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, November 2009
DOI 10.1161/circoutcomes.109.889576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Comilla Sasson, Mary A.M. Rogers, Jason Dahl, Arthur L. Kellermann

Abstract

Prior studies have identified key predictors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but differences exist in the magnitude of these findings. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the strength of associations between OHCA and key factors (event witnessed by a bystander or emergency medical services [EMS], provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], initial cardiac rhythm, or the return of spontaneous circulation). We also examined trends in OHCA survival over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 933 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 918 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 136 15%
Student > Master 121 13%
Researcher 91 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 85 9%
Student > Postgraduate 73 8%
Other 224 24%
Unknown 203 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 490 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 2%
Engineering 16 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 2%
Other 90 10%
Unknown 232 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 543. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#46,851
of 26,108,988 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#18
of 1,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63
of 109,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,108,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.