The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Climate change and the aridification of North America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2006323117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan T. Overpeck, Bradley Udall |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 42 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 134 | 72% |
| Scientists | 43 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 23% |
| Researcher | 39 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Engineering | 19 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1560. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,730
of 26,369,011 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#250
of 104,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#437
of 427,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#12
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.