| Title |
Climate change and the aridification of North America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2006323117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan T. Overpeck, Bradley Udall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 193 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 75 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 81 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 143 | 74% |
| Scientists | 41 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 23% |
| Researcher | 36 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 12% |
| Engineering | 13 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1561. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,014
of 24,875,365 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#235
of 101,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385
of 395,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.