↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Forebrain Cholinergic Signaling: Wired and Phasic, Not Tonic, and Causing Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Forebrain Cholinergic Signaling: Wired and Phasic, Not Tonic, and Causing Behavior
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, January 2020
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1305-19.2019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Sarter, Cindy Lustig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#988,117
of 15,169,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#2,159
of 19,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,783
of 273,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#60
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,169,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.