@upzone_CA @wwwojtekk This one? https://t.co/a8RJJgpPw2
@RuxandraTeslo @underthenettle Days not months and it may be cheating https://t.co/is9YfbZg8O
@sarahljaffe Always thought the “elasticity of death” was quite a fun concept https://t.co/WBfsfplffC
@adammarkowitzEA @AccountingAsArt I beg to differ, people definately die for tax savings 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/QSfsotlkyx
@thhamilton Precedent: https://t.co/DdlcNEmS0C
@RuneStahl @larsharhoff der er faktisk nogen der har foreslået en marginal men potentielt signifikant effekt: https://t.co/kelNAsqEa9 oplagt slogan til en kampagne for højere arveskat er at den redder liv (eller i hvert fald QALY's)
@Sorrocloco1 @64bd6e05b7f1445 Cuando se trata de impuestos, lo primero es entender a Pigou. Siempre podemos cambiar las leyes y la Constitución, pero los efectos de los impuestos sobre los comportamientos son inalterables. Slemrod se llevó un Ignobel por
RT @mattkahn1966: There is some empirical evidence that the timing of death is a function of taxes https://t.co/ZpWSNRLVPB. There is evi…
Dying to Save Taxes: Evidence from Estate-Tax Returns on the Death Elasticity | The Review of Economics and Statistics | MIT Press, 18 years old https://t.co/PTYWDsvl60
There is some empirical evidence that the timing of death is a function of taxes https://t.co/ZpWSNRLVPB. There is evidence that the timing of births is responsive to taxes. https://t.co/Be79RYoIDS
@MattCowgill @dannolan @swrighteconomy Cue obligatory academic citation: https://t.co/Cg3rvBQcz1
Biden’a cgt reforms and death elasticity- see thread
Nerdy tweet, but this second pic is one of my fav papers we had to read in grad school. Rich dudes literally cling to life a bit longer if there are tax implications for making it past a certain date.
and, yes, I contributed to this literature, twice: https://t.co/iyzFJUThD0 https://t.co/qgSYwcloKN https://t.co/Ws0jJeyIyX
@JulianWeigl @wrint_de Kann man alles hier nachlesen: https://t.co/r94PfOvUpS Der Abstract ist schon göttlich. Der empirical turn der VWL hat einfach auch ganz große Dinge hervorgebracht.
@ChHolmstrom @TeodorKoistinen det här pappret... om skatteändring och död... ;-) https://t.co/Lr09Uj5KC8 (förf. kan iofs inte utesluta fusk som förklaring)
@bencekd ...more the abstract than the title: https://t.co/mIi2Am3Ygt https://t.co/pLElXEtjO3
Aunque para racionalidad la que muestra este paper, por el que le dieron un Ig Nobel a Slemrod: si los impuestos afectan a decisiones como ofrecer trabajo, casarse o el momento de tener un hijo, ¿por qué no (en la medida de lo posible) al momento de morir?
@causalinf That's the seminal award winning work https://t.co/d0MqntNxSz
@monikaturyna @BachmannRudi Auch schön! Ich meinte dieses Papier (Ignoble prize 2001): prominente Autoren, gutes Journal, aber offenbar etwas zu wilde Story...😉 https://t.co/vK0l7DGJiT
@fintext It is a good paper! https://t.co/y3Ih5UnML6
今のところこれ系の決定的お話って感じ!バンチング(特定の値付近に人口が偏る現象)見るの流行ってるな~。見てわかりやすいの大事😄 古いけどイグノーベル賞のこれhttps://t.co/pWj4fIO6oEとか好き。相続税率が変わると長く生きる!w
@kevinnbass @health_advising Suggestive evidence for some causal effect of sense of purpose on survival. See, e.g., https://t.co/C0ggrdH9VV and https://t.co/U7ysTKgh4B
I...did not expect there to be research on this
@BobMurphyEcon you agree that incentives matter, don't you? https://t.co/hc014fJi3y
@FabianPfeffer @BSteverman Soon, but no too soon: https://t.co/X41hupgPaA
.@wwwojtekk I love this paper, did you do any follow-up after the 2010 hiatus in estate tax? would think huge effect? http://t.co/UWLzinyQqO
@MarrsioFootball What taxes accomplish: http://t.co/HgBIkKwaea | http://t.co/4rZp7djuCV | http://t.co/54oNqlyLff | http://t.co/T76wCHpash
@karl_r_popper 真面目路線ならこれがあります; http://t.co/eaLQggeDVY 2001年受賞です。
RT @CharNoctambule: @uncorrelated これ思い出しましたw; http://t.co/g35yHgFv イグノーベル賞2001!w
@uncorrelated これ思い出しましたw; http://t.co/g35yHgFv イグノーベル賞2001!w