| Title |
The upper-airway microbiota and loss of asthma control among asthmatic children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-13698-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanjiao Zhou, Daniel Jackson, Leonard B. Bacharier, David Mauger, Homer Boushey, Mario Castro, Juliana Durack, Yvonne Huang, Robert F. Lemanske, Gregory A. Storch, George M. Weinstock, Kristine Wylie, Ronina Covar, Anne M. Fitzpatrick, Wanda Phipatanakul, Rachel G. Robison, Avraham Beigelman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 25% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 69% |
| Scientists | 19 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#123,213
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,766
of 58,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,728
of 484,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#35
of 1,415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.