↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

The preponderance of nonsynonymous A-to-I RNA editing in coleoids is nonadaptive

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
The preponderance of nonsynonymous A-to-I RNA editing in coleoids is nonadaptive
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-13275-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daohan Jiang, Jianzhi Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,922,976
of 14,723,957 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#23,362
of 27,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,812
of 337,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#4,846
of 5,500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,723,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.