↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
608 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1111103
Pubmed ID
Authors

B Joseph Elmunzer, James M Scheiman, Glen A Lehman, Amitabh Chak, Patrick Mosler, Peter D R Higgins, Rodney A Hayward, Joseph Romagnuolo, Grace H Elta, Stuart Sherman, Akbar K Waljee, Aparna Repaka, Matthew R Atkinson, Gregory A Cote, Richard S Kwon, Lee McHenry, Cyrus R Piraka, Erik J Wamsteker, James L Watkins, Sheryl J Korsnes, Suzette E Schmidt, Sarah M Turner, Sylvia Nicholson, Evan L Fogel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Honduras 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 327 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 55 16%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Postgraduate 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 9%
Other 79 23%
Unknown 55 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 237 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 15 4%
Unknown 66 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#523,937
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#6,793
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,347
of 178,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#60
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.