↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1111103
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Joseph Elmunzer, James M. Scheiman, Glen A. Lehman, Amitabh Chak, Patrick Mosler, Peter D.R. Higgins, Rodney A. Hayward, Joseph Romagnuolo, Grace H. Elta, Stuart Sherman, Akbar K. Waljee, Aparna Repaka, Matthew R. Atkinson, Gregory A. Cote, Richard S. Kwon, Lee McHenry, Cyrus R. Piraka, Erik J. Wamsteker, James L. Watkins, Sheryl J. Korsnes, Suzette E. Schmidt, Sarah M. Turner, Sylvia Nicholson, Evan L. Fogel, Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Hayward RA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Sherman S, Waljee AK, Repaka A, Atkinson MR, Cote GA, Kwon RS, McHenry L, Piraka CR, Wamsteker EJ, Watkins JL, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Turner SM, Nicholson S, Fogel EL, Elmunzer, B. Joseph, Scheiman, James M., Lehman, Glen A., Chak, Amitabh, Mosler, Patrick, Higgins, Peter D.R., Hayward, Rodney A., Romagnuolo, Joseph, Elta, Grace H., Sherman, Stuart, Waljee, Akbar K., Repaka, Aparna, Atkinson, Matthew R., Cote, Gregory A., Kwon, Richard S., McHenry, Lee, Piraka, Cyrus R., Wamsteker, Erik J., Watkins, James L., Korsnes, Sheryl J., Schmidt, Suzette E., Turner, Sarah M., Nicholson, Sylvia, Fogel, Evan L.

Abstract

Preliminary research suggests that rectally administered nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may reduce the incidence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 2%
United States 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Honduras 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 213 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 50 22%
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Other 66 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 194 85%
Unspecified 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 <1%
Other 8 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#201,418
of 12,002,802 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,899
of 24,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,265
of 109,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#53
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,002,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.