↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1111103
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Joseph Elmunzer, James M. Scheiman, Glen A. Lehman, Amitabh Chak, Patrick Mosler, Peter D.R. Higgins, Rodney A. Hayward, Joseph Romagnuolo, Grace H. Elta, Stuart Sherman, Akbar K. Waljee, Aparna Repaka, Matthew R. Atkinson, Gregory A. Cote, Richard S. Kwon, Lee McHenry, Cyrus R. Piraka, Erik J. Wamsteker, James L. Watkins, Sheryl J. Korsnes, Suzette E. Schmidt, Sarah M. Turner, Sylvia Nicholson, Evan L. Fogel, Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Hayward RA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Sherman S, Waljee AK, Repaka A, Atkinson MR, Cote GA, Kwon RS, McHenry L, Piraka CR, Wamsteker EJ, Watkins JL, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Turner SM, Nicholson S, Fogel EL, Elmunzer, B. Joseph, Scheiman, James M., Lehman, Glen A., Chak, Amitabh, Mosler, Patrick, Higgins, Peter D.R., Hayward, Rodney A., Romagnuolo, Joseph, Elta, Grace H., Sherman, Stuart, Waljee, Akbar K., Repaka, Aparna, Atkinson, Matthew R., Cote, Gregory A., Kwon, Richard S., McHenry, Lee, Piraka, Cyrus R., Wamsteker, Erik J., Watkins, James L., Korsnes, Sheryl J., Schmidt, Suzette E., Turner, Sarah M., Nicholson, Sylvia, Fogel, Evan L.

Abstract

Preliminary research suggests that rectally administered nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may reduce the incidence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 2%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Honduras 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 199 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 47 22%
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Postgraduate 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Other 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 191 89%
Unspecified 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 <1%
Other 8 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#203,209
of 11,378,944 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,910
of 23,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,325
of 105,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#64
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,378,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.