| Title |
The contribution of host cell-directed vs. parasite-directed immunity to the disease and dynamics of malaria infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1908147116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Wale, Matthew J. Jones, Derek G. Sim, Andrew F. Read, Aaron A. King |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| India | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 68 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 48 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#527,174
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,158
of 103,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,533
of 369,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#177
of 920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.