↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

The contribution of host cell-directed vs. parasite-directed immunity to the disease and dynamics of malaria infections

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
133 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
The contribution of host cell-directed vs. parasite-directed immunity to the disease and dynamics of malaria infections
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1908147116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Wale, Matthew J. Jones, Derek G. Sim, Andrew F. Read, Aaron A. King

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#290,616
of 18,434,942 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,032
of 91,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,752
of 282,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#153
of 921 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,434,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 921 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.