| Title |
β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antibiotics and Surgical Site Infection in Colectomy Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.07.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan P Kuriakose, Joceline Vu, Monita Karmakar, Jerod Nagel, Shitanshu Uppal, Samantha Hendren, Michael J Englesbe, Raj Ravikumar, Darrell A Campbell, Greta L Krapohl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Yemen | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 23% |
| Scientists | 11 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#754,264
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#249
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,720
of 360,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.