↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antibiotics and Surgical Site Infection in Colectomy Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
88 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antibiotics and Surgical Site Infection in Colectomy Patients
Published in
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.07.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan P. Kuriakose, Joceline Vu, Monita Karmakar, Jerod Nagel, Shitanshu Uppal, Samantha Hendren, Michael J. Englesbe, Raj Ravikumar, Darrell A. Campbell, Greta L. Krapohl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#335,882
of 13,777,260 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#171
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,315
of 250,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#10
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,777,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.