| Title |
Defining Barriers and Facilitators to Advancement for Women in Academic Surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie A. Thompson-Burdine, Dana A. Telem, Jennifer F. Waljee, Erika A. Newman, Dawn M. Coleman, Hadley I. Stoll, Gurjit Sandhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 168 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 85 | 51% |
| Canada | 8 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 49 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 30% |
| Scientists | 41 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 56 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 22% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 65 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#406,167
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,509
of 9,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,272
of 350,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#84
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.