↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Defining Barriers and Facilitators to Advancement for Women in Academic Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
186 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Defining Barriers and Facilitators to Advancement for Women in Academic Surgery
Published in
JAMA Network Open, August 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A. Thompson-Burdine, Dana A. Telem, Jennifer F. Waljee, Erika A. Newman, Dawn M. Coleman, Hadley I. Stoll, Gurjit Sandhu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2019.
All research outputs
#126,643
of 13,778,033 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#268
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,285
of 249,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#35
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,778,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 112.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.