↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Defining Barriers and Facilitators to Advancement for Women in Academic Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
170 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Defining Barriers and Facilitators to Advancement for Women in Academic Surgery
Published in
JAMA Network Open, August 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A. Thompson-Burdine, Dana A. Telem, Jennifer F. Waljee, Erika A. Newman, Dawn M. Coleman, Hadley I. Stoll, Gurjit Sandhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 170 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Master 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 54 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Psychology 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 63 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#397,001
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,434
of 9,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,157
of 350,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#83
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.