| Title |
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Radiation Oncology—Are We Improving?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Practical Radiation Oncology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.prro.2019.06.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael K Rooney, Sean Sachdev, John Byun, Reshma Jagsi, Daniel W Golden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 57% |
| Ireland | 3 | 8% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,593,472
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Practical Radiation Oncology
#76
of 1,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,308
of 367,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Practical Radiation Oncology
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.