| Title |
Better late than never: why obstetricians must implement enhanced recovery after cesarean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Friedman Peahl, Roger Smith, Timothy R B Johnson, Daniel M Morgan, Mark D Pearlman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 25% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 22% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#424,660
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#342
of 13,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,215
of 363,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#6
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.