↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Better late than never: why obstetricians must implement enhanced recovery after cesarean

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
46 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Better late than never: why obstetricians must implement enhanced recovery after cesarean
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Friedman Peahl, Roger Smith, Timothy R.B. Johnson, Daniel M. Morgan, Mark D. Pearlman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Unspecified 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#170,167
of 13,407,861 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#111
of 8,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,186
of 252,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,407,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.